Magnetic Resonance Imaging is more sensitive than Computed Tomography Angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review

J. Habets; H.J.A. Zandvoort; J.B. Reitsma; L.W. Bartels; F.L. Moll; T. Leiner; J.A. van Herwaarden

Magnetic Resonance Imaging is more sensitive than Computed Tomography Angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review

Translated title of the contribution: Magnetic Resonance Imaging is more sensitive than Computed Tomography Angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review

J. Habets, H.J.A. Zandvoort, J.B. Reitsma, L.W. Bartels, F.L. Moll, T. Leiner, J.A. van Herwaarden

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Translated title of the contribution	Magnetic Resonance Imaging is more sensitive than Computed Tomography Angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review
Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	340-350
Number of pages	11
Journal	European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Volume	45
Issue number	4
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403221

Cite this

Habets, J., Zandvoort, H. J. A., Reitsma, J. B., Bartels, L. W., Moll, F. L., Leiner, T., & van Herwaarden, J. A. (2013). Magnetic Resonance Imaging is more sensitive than Computed Tomography Angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 45(4), 340-350. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403221

@article{85fcf3d3af1c43bdbc5af5363f42bbfe,

title = "Magnetic Resonance Imaging is more sensitive than Computed Tomography Angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review",

author = "J. Habets and H.J.A. Zandvoort and J.B. Reitsma and L.W. Bartels and F.L. Moll and T. Leiner and {van Herwaarden}, J.A.",

year = "2013",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "45",

pages = "340--350",

journal = "European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery",

issn = "1078-5884",

publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

number = "4",

}

Habets, J, Zandvoort, HJA, Reitsma, JB , Bartels, LW, Moll, FL, Leiner, T & van Herwaarden, JA 2013, 'Magnetic Resonance Imaging is more sensitive than Computed Tomography Angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review', European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 340-350. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23403221>

Magnetic Resonance Imaging is more sensitive than Computed Tomography Angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review. / Habets, J.; Zandvoort, H.J.A.; Reitsma, J.B. et al.
In: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2013, p. 340-350.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetic Resonance Imaging is more sensitive than Computed Tomography Angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review

AU - Habets, J.

AU - Zandvoort, H.J.A.

AU - Reitsma, J.B.

AU - Bartels, L.W.

AU - Moll, F.L.

AU - Leiner, T.

AU - van Herwaarden, J.A.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

M3 - Article

SN - 1078-5884

VL - 45

SP - 340

EP - 350

JO - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

JF - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

IS - 4

ER -