Machine learning for the early prediction of infants with electrographic seizures in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy

OBJECTIVE: To assess if early clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) features predict later seizure development in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).

METHODS: Clinical and EEG parameters <12 h of birth from infants with HIE across eight European Neonatal Units were used to develop seizure-prediction models. Clinical parameters included intrapartum complications, fetal distress, gestational age, delivery mode, gender, birth weight, Apgar scores, assisted ventilation, cord pH, and blood gases. The earliest EEG hour provided a qualitative analysis (discontinuity, amplitude, asymmetry/asynchrony, sleep-wake cycle [SWC]) and a quantitative analysis (power, discontinuity, spectral distribution, inter-hemispheric connectivity) from full montage and two-channel amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG). Subgroup analysis, only including infants without anti-seizure medication (ASM) prior to EEG was also performed. Machine-learning (ML) models (random forest and gradient boosting algorithms) were developed to predict infants who would later develop seizures and assessed using Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS: The study included 162 infants with HIE (53 had seizures). Low Apgar, need for ventilation, high lactate, low base excess, absent SWC, low EEG power, and increased EEG discontinuity were associated with seizures. The following predictive models were developed: clinical (MCC 0.368, AUC 0.681), qualitative EEG (MCC 0.467, AUC 0.729), quantitative EEG (MCC 0.473, AUC 0.730), clinical and qualitative EEG (MCC 0.470, AUC 0.721), and clinical and quantitative EEG (MCC 0.513, AUC 0.746). The clinical and qualitative-EEG model significantly outperformed the clinical model alone (MCC 0.470 vs 0.368, p-value .037). The clinical and quantitative-EEG model significantly outperformed the clinical model (MCC 0.513 vs 0.368, p-value .012). The clinical and quantitative-EEG model for infants without ASM (n = 131) had MCC 0.588, AUC 0.832. Performance for quantitative aEEG (n = 159) was MCC 0.381, AUC 0.696 and clinical and quantitative aEEG was MCC 0.384, AUC 0.720.

SIGNIFICANCE: Early EEG background analysis combined with readily available clinical data helped predict infants who were at highest risk of seizures, hours before they occur. Automated quantitative-EEG analysis was as good as expert analysis for predicting seizures, supporting the use of automated assessment tools for early evaluation of HIE.