Longitudinal Motor-Developmental Outcomes in Infants with a Critical Congenital Heart Defect

Maaike C A Sprong, Marco van Brussel, Linda S de Vries, Janjaap van der Net, Joppe Nijman, Johannes M P J Breur, Martijn G Slieker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Infants with critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) are at increased risk for neurodevelopmental delays. The early identification of motor delays is clinically relevant to prevent or reduce long-term consequences. The current study aims to describe the motor-developmental pathways of infants with a CCHD. Motor development was assessed in 215 infants and toddlers using the Dutch version of the Bayley-III. At 3 months (n = 165), 9 months (n = 188), and 18 months (n = 171) the motor composite scores were 97, 98, and 104, respectively. A motor composite score of ≤-2 SD was only seen in 2.4%, 0%, and 2.3%, respectively, with gross motor deficits being observed more often than fine motor deficits (12% vs. 0% at 18 months). Over 90% of infants who scored average at 9 months still did so at 18 months. The majority of infants with below-average gross motor scores (≤-1) at 9 months still had a below-average or delayed motor score (≤-2 SD) at 18 months. Abnormal gross motor scores (≤-2 SD) increased with age. Infants with single-ventricle physiology performed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) worse on both fine and gross motor skills at 9 and 18 months compared to infants with other CCHDs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number570
Pages (from-to)1-16
JournalChildren (Basel, Switzerland)
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Apr 2022

Keywords

  • Bayley-III
  • cardiac surgery
  • children
  • critical congenital heart disease
  • gross motor delay
  • infants
  • motor development
  • neurodevelopmental outcomes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Longitudinal Motor-Developmental Outcomes in Infants with a Critical Congenital Heart Defect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this