TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term follow-up of contemporary drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients
T2 - Subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial
AU - van Hemert, Nicole D.
AU - Voskuil, Michiel
AU - Rozemeijer, Rik
AU - Kraaijeveld, Adriaan O.
AU - Rittersma, Saskia Z.
AU - Leenders, Geert E.H.
AU - Stein, Mèra
AU - Frambach, Peter
AU - van der Harst, Pim
AU - Agostoni, Pierfrancesco
AU - Stella, Pieter R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank all contributing research nurses, technicians, and personnel who contributed in the successful execution of this study. The authors express special thanks to Yvonne Breuer, Manager; Manon Kuikhoven, Clinical Research Coordinator; Marlies van Doleweerd, Clinical Research Coordinator; and Karen Vlaardingerbroek, Clinical Research Coordinator, Department of Research and Development, University Medical Center Utrecht, and all physicians involved in the execution of this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Objective: The elevated risk of adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients persists with newer-generation DES. The polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent (PF-AES) possesses characteristics with a potentially enhanced performance in patients with diabetes. Data from the 1-year follow-up period has been previously published. The aim of this subanalysis was to assess long-term performance of two contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) in a diabetic population. Methods: In the ReCre8 trial, patients were stratified for diabetes and troponin status, and randomized to implantation of a permanent polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (PP-ZES) or PF-AES. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction and target-lesion revascularization. Clinical outcomes between discharge and 3 years follow-up were assessed. Results: A total of 302 patients with diabetes were included in this analysis. After 3 years, TLF occurred in 12.5% of PP-ZES patients versus 10.0% in PF-AES patients (p = 0.46). Similarly, the separate components of TLF were comparable between the two study arms. The secondary composite endpoint of NACE was higher in the PP-ZES arm with 45 cases (29.6%) versus 30 cases (20.0%) in the PF-AES arm (p = 0.036). In the insulin-dependent diabetic population, TLF occurred in 19.1% of PP-ZES patients versus 10.4% of PF-AES patients (p = 0.21). NACE occurred in 40.4% of PP-ZES patients versus 27.1% of PF-AES patients (p = 0.10). Conclusions: This subanalysis shows that the use of PF-AES results in similar clinical outcomes as compared to PP-ZES, yet some benefits of use of PF-AES in diabetic patients may prevail. Future dedicated trials should confirm these findings.
AB - Objective: The elevated risk of adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients persists with newer-generation DES. The polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent (PF-AES) possesses characteristics with a potentially enhanced performance in patients with diabetes. Data from the 1-year follow-up period has been previously published. The aim of this subanalysis was to assess long-term performance of two contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) in a diabetic population. Methods: In the ReCre8 trial, patients were stratified for diabetes and troponin status, and randomized to implantation of a permanent polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (PP-ZES) or PF-AES. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction and target-lesion revascularization. Clinical outcomes between discharge and 3 years follow-up were assessed. Results: A total of 302 patients with diabetes were included in this analysis. After 3 years, TLF occurred in 12.5% of PP-ZES patients versus 10.0% in PF-AES patients (p = 0.46). Similarly, the separate components of TLF were comparable between the two study arms. The secondary composite endpoint of NACE was higher in the PP-ZES arm with 45 cases (29.6%) versus 30 cases (20.0%) in the PF-AES arm (p = 0.036). In the insulin-dependent diabetic population, TLF occurred in 19.1% of PP-ZES patients versus 10.4% of PF-AES patients (p = 0.21). NACE occurred in 40.4% of PP-ZES patients versus 27.1% of PF-AES patients (p = 0.10). Conclusions: This subanalysis shows that the use of PF-AES results in similar clinical outcomes as compared to PP-ZES, yet some benefits of use of PF-AES in diabetic patients may prevail. Future dedicated trials should confirm these findings.
KW - coronary artery disease
KW - diabetes mellitus
KW - percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects
KW - Drug-Eluting Stents
KW - Follow-Up Studies
KW - Humans
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis
KW - Prosthesis Design
KW - Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging
KW - Cardiovascular Agents/adverse effects
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147005208&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ccd.30545
DO - 10.1002/ccd.30545
M3 - Article
C2 - 36651339
AN - SCOPUS:85147005208
SN - 1522-1946
VL - 101
SP - 505
EP - 510
JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 3
ER -