Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Long-term antithrombotic treatment in intracranial hemorrhage survivors with atrial fibrillation

  • Eleni Korompoki
  • , Filippos T. Filippidis
  • , Peter B. Nielsen
  • , Angela Del Giudice
  • , Gregory Y H Lip
  • , Joji B. Kuramatsu
  • , Hagen B. Huttner
  • , Jiming Fang
  • , Sam Schulman
  • , Joan Martí-Fàbregas
  • , Celine S. Gathier
  • , Anand Viswanathan
  • , Alessandro Biffi
  • , Daniela Poli
  • , Christian Weimar
  • , Uwe Malzahn
  • , Peter Heuschmann
  • , Roland Veltkamp*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting recurrent intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and ischemic stroke (IS) in ICH survivors with atrial fibrillation (AF) during long-term follow-up. Methods: A comprehensive literature search including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, clinical trials registry was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We considered studies capturing outcome events (ICH recurrence and IS) for ≥3 months and treatment exposure to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), antiplatelet agents (APAs), or no antithrombotic medication (no-ATM). Corresponding authors provided aggregate data for IS and ICH recurrence rate between 6 weeks after the event and 1 year of follow-up for each treatment exposure. Meta-analyses of pooled rate ratios (RRs) were conducted with the inverse variance method. Results: Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria. Seven observational studies enrolling 2,452 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled RR estimates for IS were lower for VKAs compared to APAs (RR = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.74, p = 0.002) and no-ATM (RR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.77, p = 0.002). Pooled RR estimates for ICH recurrence were not significantly increased across treatment groups (VKA vs APA: RR = 1.34, 95% CI 0.79-2.30, p = 0.28; VKA vs no-ATM: RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.45-1.90, p = 0.84). Conclusions: In observational studies, anticoagulation with VKA is associated with a lower rate of IS than APA or no-ATM without increasing ICH recurrence significantly. A randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the net clinical benefit of anticoagulation in ICH survivors with AF.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)687-696
Number of pages10
JournalNeurology
Volume89
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term antithrombotic treatment in intracranial hemorrhage survivors with atrial fibrillation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this