TY - JOUR
T1 - Local treatment in metastatic GIST patients
T2 - A multicentre analysis from the Dutch GIST Registry
AU - Brink, Pien
AU - Kalisvaart, Gijsbert M.
AU - Schrage, Yvonne M.
AU - Mohammadi, Mahmoud
AU - Ijzerman, Nikki S.
AU - Bleckman, Roos F.
AU - Wal, Tom
AU - de Geus-Oei, Lioe Fee
AU - Hartgrink, Henk H.
AU - Grunhagen, Dirk J.
AU - Verhoef, Cornelis
AU - Sleijfer, Stefan
AU - Oosten, Astrid W.
AU - Been, Lukas B.
AU - van Ginkel, Robert J.
AU - Reyners, An K.L.
AU - Bonenkamp, Han J.
AU - Desar, Ingrid M.E.
AU - Gelderblom, Hans
AU - van Houdt, Winan J.
AU - Steeghs, Neeltje
AU - Fiocco, Marta
AU - van der Hage, Jos A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Background: The added value of local treatment in selected metastatic GIST patients is unclear. This study aims to provide insight into the usefulness of local treatment in metastatic GIST by use of a survey study and retrospective analyses in a clinical database. Methods: A survey study was conducted among clinical specialists to select most relevant characteristics of metastatic GIST patients considered for local treatment, defined as elective surgery or ablation. Patients were selected from the Dutch GIST Registry. A multivariate Cox-regression model for overall survival since time of diagnosis of metastatic disease was estimated with local treatment as a time-dependent variable. An additional model was estimated to assess prognostic factors since local treatment. Results: The survey's response rate was 14/16. Performance status, response to TKIs, location of active disease, number of lesions, mutation status, and time between primary diagnosis and metastases, were regarded the 6 most important characteristics. Of 457 included patients, 123 underwent local treatment, which was associated with better survival after diagnosis of metastases (HR = 0.558, 95%CI = 0.336–0.928). Progressive disease during systemic treatment (HR = 3.885, 95%CI = 1.195–12.627) and disease confined to the liver (HR = 0.269, 95%CI = 0.082–0.880) were associated with worse and better survival after local treatment, respectively. Conclusion: Local treatment is associated with better survival in selected patients with metastatic GIST. Locally treated patients with response to TKIs and disease confined to the liver have good clinical outcome. These results might be considered for tailoring treatment, but should be interpreted with care because only specific patients are provided with local treatment in this retrospective study.
AB - Background: The added value of local treatment in selected metastatic GIST patients is unclear. This study aims to provide insight into the usefulness of local treatment in metastatic GIST by use of a survey study and retrospective analyses in a clinical database. Methods: A survey study was conducted among clinical specialists to select most relevant characteristics of metastatic GIST patients considered for local treatment, defined as elective surgery or ablation. Patients were selected from the Dutch GIST Registry. A multivariate Cox-regression model for overall survival since time of diagnosis of metastatic disease was estimated with local treatment as a time-dependent variable. An additional model was estimated to assess prognostic factors since local treatment. Results: The survey's response rate was 14/16. Performance status, response to TKIs, location of active disease, number of lesions, mutation status, and time between primary diagnosis and metastases, were regarded the 6 most important characteristics. Of 457 included patients, 123 underwent local treatment, which was associated with better survival after diagnosis of metastases (HR = 0.558, 95%CI = 0.336–0.928). Progressive disease during systemic treatment (HR = 3.885, 95%CI = 1.195–12.627) and disease confined to the liver (HR = 0.269, 95%CI = 0.082–0.880) were associated with worse and better survival after local treatment, respectively. Conclusion: Local treatment is associated with better survival in selected patients with metastatic GIST. Locally treated patients with response to TKIs and disease confined to the liver have good clinical outcome. These results might be considered for tailoring treatment, but should be interpreted with care because only specific patients are provided with local treatment in this retrospective study.
KW - Advanced
KW - Gastro-intestinal stromal tumours
KW - GIST
KW - Local treatment
KW - Metastatic
KW - Surgery
KW - Survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160356124&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.017
DO - 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 37246093
AN - SCOPUS:85160356124
SN - 0748-7983
VL - 49
JO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 9
M1 - 106942
ER -