TY - JOUR
T1 - Liquid Biopsies to Monitor Solid Organ Transplant Function
T2 - A Review of New Biomarkers
AU - Verhoeven, Jeroen G H P
AU - Boer, Karin
AU - Van Schaik, Ron H N
AU - Manintveld, Olivier C
AU - Huibers, Manon M H
AU - Baan, Carla C
AU - Hesselink, Dennis A
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Despite modern immunosuppressive therapy, allograft rejection remains a major cause of solid organ transplant dysfunction. For clinical care, organ transplant function is routinely monitored by measuring biomarkers that, depending on the organ transplanted, include serum creatinine, N-terminal pro-hormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and aspartate aminotransferase. All can be measured easily in clinical chemistry laboratories. The main problem with these biomarkers is that they have a low sensitivity for the detection of allograft damage and are nonspecific for the detection of allograft rejection. To diagnose rejection, histologic examination of grafted tissue is necessary, which requires an invasive biopsy procedure. There is thus an unmet need in transplantation medicine for biomarkers that are specific for rejection, identify graft injury at an early stage, and may eventually overcome the need for a transplant biopsy. Recently, tremendous progress in the field of biomarkers has been made. In this narrative review, the potential of donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA), cell-free nucleosomes, and extracellular vesicles to act as next-generation biomarkers for solid organ transplant is discussed. Based on the fact that cell content is released during rejection, these markers could serve as very specific biomarkers for allograft injury and rejection. These markers have the potential to improve rejection monitoring, evaluate the response to antirejection therapy, and may decrease the need for invasive procedures.
AB - Despite modern immunosuppressive therapy, allograft rejection remains a major cause of solid organ transplant dysfunction. For clinical care, organ transplant function is routinely monitored by measuring biomarkers that, depending on the organ transplanted, include serum creatinine, N-terminal pro-hormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and aspartate aminotransferase. All can be measured easily in clinical chemistry laboratories. The main problem with these biomarkers is that they have a low sensitivity for the detection of allograft damage and are nonspecific for the detection of allograft rejection. To diagnose rejection, histologic examination of grafted tissue is necessary, which requires an invasive biopsy procedure. There is thus an unmet need in transplantation medicine for biomarkers that are specific for rejection, identify graft injury at an early stage, and may eventually overcome the need for a transplant biopsy. Recently, tremendous progress in the field of biomarkers has been made. In this narrative review, the potential of donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA), cell-free nucleosomes, and extracellular vesicles to act as next-generation biomarkers for solid organ transplant is discussed. Based on the fact that cell content is released during rejection, these markers could serve as very specific biomarkers for allograft injury and rejection. These markers have the potential to improve rejection monitoring, evaluate the response to antirejection therapy, and may decrease the need for invasive procedures.
KW - Allograft
KW - Biomarkers
KW - CfDNA
KW - Extracellular vesicles
KW - Nucleosomes
KW - Rejection
KW - Transplantation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064136713
U2 - 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000549
DO - 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000549
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29957668
SN - 0163-4356
VL - 40
SP - 515
EP - 525
JO - Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
JF - Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
IS - 5
ER -