Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the prevalence, type and extent of linguistic spin in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring interventions in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), as well as to investigate whether study variables were correlated with linguistic spin. Study design and setting: PubMed was searched from 2011 to 2020 to identify RCTs including patients with AMD. Two authors independently assessed a total of 96 RCTs. Linear regression analyses were performed to investigate whether linguistic spin was correlated with predefined study variables. Results: Linguistic spin was found in 61 of 96 abstracts (63.5%) and in 90 of 96 main texts (93.8%). Use of words pointing out the beneficial effect of a treatment and the use of ‘(statistically) significant/significance' without reporting a P-value or a 95% confidence interval (CI) were the most frequently identified categories of linguistic spin. Sample size was significantly correlated with the total linguistic spin score (95% CI 0.38–5.23, P = 0.02). Conclusion: A high prevalence and extent of linguistic spin in RCTs about AMD was found. We highlighted the importance of objective reporting and awareness of linguistic spin among ophthalmologists and other readers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 961996 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Epidemiology |
| Volume | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Oct 2022 |
Keywords
- age-related macular degeneration (AMD)
- linguistic spin
- ophthalmology
- overinterpretation
- randomized controlled trial
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Linguistic spin in randomized controlled trials about age-related macular degeneration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver