Abstract
We sought to investigate the reliability of standard conventional perimetry (SCP) in neurologically impaired (NI) children using the examiner-based assessment of reliability scoring system and to determine the difference in time to diagnosis of a visual field defect between SCP and a behavioural visual field (BVF) test. Patient records of 115 NI children were retrospectively analysed. The full field peritest (FFP) had best reliability with 44% ‘good’ scores versus 22% for Goldmann perimetry (p < .001). The mean age of NI children able to perform SCP was 8.3 years versus 4.6 years for the BVF test (p < .001). Use of the BVF test may significantly reduce time to diagnosis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 361-370 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Neuro-Ophthalmology |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2020 |
Keywords
- Cerebral visual impairment (CVI)
- children
- neurological impairment (NI)
- perimetry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Lessons Learned from 23 Years of Experience in Testing Visual Fields of Neurologically Impaired Children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver