LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies

Brendan Bulik-Sullivan, Po Ru Loh, Hilary K. Finucane, Stephan Ripke, Jian Yang, Nick Patterson, Mark J. Daly, Alkes L. Price, Benjamin M. Neale*, Aiden Corvin, James T.R. Walters, Kai How Farh, Peter A. Holmans, Phil Lee, David A. Collier, Hailiang Huang, Tune H. Pers, Ingrid Agartz, Esben Agerbo, Margot AlbusMadeline Alexander, Farooq Amin, Silviu A. Bacanu, Martin Begemann, Richard A. Belliveau, Judit Bene, Sarah E. Bergen, Elizabeth Bevilacqua, Tim B. Bigdeli, Donald W. Black, Richard Bruggeman, Nancy G. Buccola, Randy L. Buckner, William Byerley, Wiepke Cahn, Guiqing Cai, Murray J. Cairns, Dominique Campion, Rita M. Cantor, Vaughan J. Carr, Noa Carrera, Stanley V. Catts, Kimberly D. Chambert, Raymond C.K. Chan, Ronald Y.L. Chen, Eric Y.H. Chen, René S. Kahn, Kieran C. Murphy, Jim Van Os, Roel A. Ophoff,

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

414 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Both polygenicity (many small genetic effects) and confounding biases, such as cryptic relatedness and population stratification, can yield an inflated distribution of test statistics in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, current methods cannot distinguish between inflation from a true polygenic signal and bias. We have developed an approach, LD Score regression, that quantifies the contribution of each by examining the relationship between test statistics and linkage disequilibrium (LD). The LD Score regression intercept can be used to estimate a more powerful and accurate correction factor than genomic control. We find strong evidence that polygenicity accounts for the majority of the inflation in test statistics in many GWAS of large sample size.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-295
Number of pages5
JournalNature Genetics
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Feb 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this