Abstract
HRD professionals can be considered to be knowledgeable about knowledge management practices in their own offices. Effectiveness of knowledge management practices of three HRD offices were studied, using a combination of structured questionnaires plus interviews with four HRD professionals per office. Three categories of knowledge management activities were considered, by the members of these organisations, to be effective: activities that expand the individual or collective experiential horizon; activities that are meant to consolidate knowledge; informal and formal communication about work issues. Conditions that facilitate or inhibit these activities are identified. Organisations wishing to improve their knowledge productivity are confronted with some fundamental choices: innovation versus routine, office versus officer, and knowledge sharing versus knowledge shielding.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 286-295 |
| Journal | Journal of workplace learning |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2000 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- knowledge management
- HRD
- Learning and development
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Knowledge management in the HRD office: a comparison of three cases.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver