Knowledge-Based Assessment of Focal Dose Escalation Treatment Plans in Prostate Cancer

Marcel A van Schie, Tomas M Janssen, Dave Eekhout, Iris Walraven, Floris J Pos, Peter de Ruiter, Alexis N T J Kotte, Evelyn M Monninkhof, Linda G W Kerkmeijer, Cédric Draulans, Robin de Roover, Karin Haustermans, Martina Kunze-Busch, Robert Jan Smeenk, Uulke A van der Heide

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: In a randomized focal dose escalation radiation therapy trial for prostate cancer (FLAME), up to 95 Gy was prescribed to the tumor in the dose-escalated arm, with 77 Gy to the entire prostate in both arms. As dose constraints to organs at risk had priority over dose escalation and suboptimal planning could occur, we investigated how well the dose to the tumor was boosted. We developed an anatomy-based prediction model to identify plans with suboptimal tumor dose and performed replanning to validate our model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: We derived dose-volume parameters from planned dose distributions of 539 FLAME trial patients in 4 institutions and compared them between both arms. In the dose-escalated arm, we determined overlap volume histograms and derived features representing patient anatomy. We predicted tumor D98% with a linear regression on anatomic features and performed replanning on 21 plans.

RESULTS: In the dose-escalated arm, the median tumor D50% and D98% were 93.0 and 84.7 Gy, and 99% of the tumors had a dose escalation greater than 82.4 Gy (107% of 77 Gy). In both arms organs at risk constraints were met. Five out of 73 anatomic features were found to be predictive for tumor D98%. Median predicted tumor D98% was 4.4 Gy higher than planned D98%. Upon replanning, median tumor D98% increased by 3.0 Gy. A strong correlation between predicted increase in D98% and realized increase upon replanning was found (ρ = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS: Focal dose escalation in prostate cancer was feasible with a dose escalation to 99% of the tumors. Replanning resulted in an increased tumor dose that correlated well with the prediction model. The model was able to identify tumors on which a higher boost dose could be planned. The model has potential as a quality assessment tool in focal dose escalated treatment plans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1055-1062
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume108
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Knowledge-Based Assessment of Focal Dose Escalation Treatment Plans in Prostate Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this