TY - JOUR
T1 - Key Considerations in the Health Technology Assessment of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Scotland, The Netherlands, and England
AU - ten Ham, Renske M.T.
AU - Frederix, Geert W.J.
AU - Wu, Olivia
AU - Goettsch, Wim
AU - Leufkens, Hubert G.M.
AU - Klungel, Olaf H.
AU - Hoekman, Jarno
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/Support: The authors received no financial support for this research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Objectives: Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are highly innovative therapies. Their costs and uncertain value claims have raised concerns among health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and payers. Little is known about how underlying considerations in HTA of ATMPs shape assessment and reimbursement recommendations. We aim to identify and assess key considerations that played a role in HTA of ATMPs underlying reimbursement recommendations. Methods: A review of HTA reports was conducted of all authorized ATMPs in Scotland, The Netherlands, and England. Considerations were extracted and categorized into EUnetHTA Core Model domains. Per jurisdiction, considerations were aggregated and key considerations identified (defined as occurring in >1/assessment per jurisdiction). A narrative analysis was conducted comparing key considerations between jurisdictions and different reimbursement recommendations. Results: We identified 15 ATMPs and 18 HTA reports. In The Netherlands and England most key considerations were identified in clinical effectiveness (EFF) and cost- and economic effectiveness (ECO) domains. In Scotland, the social aspects domain yielded most key considerations, followed by ECO and EFF. More uncertainty in evidence and assessment outcomes was accepted when orphan or end-of-life criteria were applied. A higher percentage of considerations supporting recommendations were identified for products with positive recommendations compared with restricted and negative recommendations. Conclusions: This is the first empirical review of HTA's using the EUnetHTA Core Model to identify and structure key considerations retrospectively. It provides insights in supporting and opposing considerations for reimbursement of individual products and differences between jurisdictions. Besides the EFF and ECO domain, the social, ethical, and legal domains seem to bear considerable weight in assessment of ATMPs.
AB - Objectives: Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are highly innovative therapies. Their costs and uncertain value claims have raised concerns among health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and payers. Little is known about how underlying considerations in HTA of ATMPs shape assessment and reimbursement recommendations. We aim to identify and assess key considerations that played a role in HTA of ATMPs underlying reimbursement recommendations. Methods: A review of HTA reports was conducted of all authorized ATMPs in Scotland, The Netherlands, and England. Considerations were extracted and categorized into EUnetHTA Core Model domains. Per jurisdiction, considerations were aggregated and key considerations identified (defined as occurring in >1/assessment per jurisdiction). A narrative analysis was conducted comparing key considerations between jurisdictions and different reimbursement recommendations. Results: We identified 15 ATMPs and 18 HTA reports. In The Netherlands and England most key considerations were identified in clinical effectiveness (EFF) and cost- and economic effectiveness (ECO) domains. In Scotland, the social aspects domain yielded most key considerations, followed by ECO and EFF. More uncertainty in evidence and assessment outcomes was accepted when orphan or end-of-life criteria were applied. A higher percentage of considerations supporting recommendations were identified for products with positive recommendations compared with restricted and negative recommendations. Conclusions: This is the first empirical review of HTA's using the EUnetHTA Core Model to identify and structure key considerations retrospectively. It provides insights in supporting and opposing considerations for reimbursement of individual products and differences between jurisdictions. Besides the EFF and ECO domain, the social, ethical, and legal domains seem to bear considerable weight in assessment of ATMPs.
KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods
KW - Ethical Analysis
KW - Europe
KW - Humans
KW - Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods
KW - Therapies, Investigational/economics
KW - Uncertainty
KW - health technology assessment
KW - gene therapy
KW - advanced therapies
KW - cell therapy
KW - advanced therapy medicinal products
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121143333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 35227451
SN - 1098-3015
VL - 25
SP - 390
EP - 399
JO - Value in Health
JF - Value in Health
IS - 3
ER -