TY - JOUR
T1 - Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients?
AU - Haak, Hester E.
AU - Maas, Monique
AU - Lambregts, Doenja M.J.
AU - Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.
AU - Beets, Geerard L.
AU - Melenhorst, Jarno
AU - Sande, Marit E.van der
AU - Westreenen, Henderik L.van
AU - Talsma, A. K.(Koen)
AU - Breukink, Stephanie O.
AU - Zimmerman, David D.E.
AU - Hilling, Denise E.
AU - Wilt, Johannes H.W.de
AU - Peeters, Koen C.M.J.
AU - Graaf, Eelco J.R.de
AU - Tuynman, Jurriaan B.
AU - Sonneveld, Dirk J.A.
AU - Komen, Niels
AU - Pronk, Apollo
AU - Intven, Martijn
AU - Schreurs, W. H.(Hermien)
AU - Hoff, Christiaan
N1 - Funding Information:
No acknowledgements.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Introduction: The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Material and methods: Patients were included in a W&W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score. Results: 43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems. Conclusion: W&W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function.
AB - Introduction: The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Material and methods: Patients were included in a W&W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score. Results: 43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems. Conclusion: W&W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function.
KW - Chemoradiation
KW - Functional outcomes
KW - Older patients
KW - Oncological outcomes
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - Watch-and-wait approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078205728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85078205728
SN - 0748-7983
VL - 46
SP - 358
EP - 362
JO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 3
ER -