Abstract
Should professionals systematically screen whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data to check for life-threatening mutations? Alternatively, should genome analysis focus on the primary reason for testing – that is, aiming to achieve precision medicine? We present an ethical review of the arguments and compare the act of searching for mutations with disclosing mutations that are discovered incidentally.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3-6 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Trends in molecular medicine |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
Keywords
- duty to hunt
- genomics
- incidental finding
- opportunistic screening
- routine screening
- unsolicited finding