Abstract
The complex relation between a person and their mental disorder is a recurring theme in (reflections on) psychiatric practice. As there is no uncontested concept of 'self', nor of 'mental disorder', the 'self-illness' relation is riddled with ambiguity. In this feature article, we summarise recent philosophical work on the phenomenon of 'self-illness ambiguity', to provide conceptual tools for psychiatric reflections on the self-illness relation. Specifically, we argue that the concept of self-illness ambiguity may contribute to patients' self-understanding and shed light on how paradigms of care and research should be revised in order to help clinicians support that self-understanding. We also suggest that the concept of self-illness ambiguity may improve the understanding of particular mental disorders, and may offer conceptual tools to address various ethical matters (including stigma and responsibility).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 274-277 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science |
| Volume | 228 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 4 Sept 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2026 |
Keywords
- diagnosis and classification
- ethics
- patients
- Philosophy
- psychotherapy
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver