Is it justified to ablate flat-type esophageal squamous cancer? An analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens of lesions meeting the selection criteria of radiofrequency studies

Marnix Jansen, Dirk W Schölvinck, Ryoji Kushima, Shigeki Sekine, Bas L A M Weusten, Guiqi Q Wang, David E Fleischer, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Sanford M Dawsey, Sybren L Meijer, Jacques J G H M Bergman, Ichiro Oda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) appears to be a safe and effective treatment for flat-type noninvasive squamous neoplasia of the esophagus. However, if RFA is applied to lesions containing invasive cancer (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [ESCC]), histological features associated with lymph node metastases may remain undetected. In addition, extension of neoplasia down the ducts of esophageal submucosal glands (SMGs) may create a sheltered "niche" beyond the reach of ablation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the RFA eligibility of flat-type ESCC.

DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of ESCC patients.

SETTING: National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

PATIENTS: Patients with flat-type ESCC larger than 3 cm removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

INTERVENTIONS: Three endoscopists involved in RFA studies in China reviewed endoscopic images to select lesions eligible for RFA. Corresponding ESD resection specimens were histologically examined.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The presence of poor histological features (ie, invasion in m3 or deeper, poor tumor differentiation, or lymphovascular invasion) and the number of involved esophageal SMGs and ducts.

RESULTS: Sixty-five lesions were included, 17 (26%) of which qualified as RFA eligible by RFA endoscopists. Interobserver agreement for this assessment was poor (κ = 0.09). Six of the 17 specimens (35%) showed relevant disease: 4 lesions invaded in the muscularis mucosae, 1 of which also showed lymphovascular invasion; 2 lesions showed extension of neoplasia into SMGs.

LIMITATIONS: Limited number of cases. RFA eligibility status was based on analysis of still images.

CONCLUSIONS: One third of flat-type ESCC, deemed eligible for RFA, demonstrated histological features that are considered (relative) contraindications to endoscopic treatment. Because it appears difficult for endoscopists to identify low-risk ESCC, conservative use of RFA for flat-type ESCC is advocated until long-term follow-up data are available.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)995-1002
Number of pages8
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume80
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology
  • Catheter Ablation
  • Databases, Factual
  • Dissection
  • Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology
  • Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Esophagoscopy
  • Esophagus/pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mucous Membrane/pathology
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tumor Burden

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is it justified to ablate flat-type esophageal squamous cancer? An analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens of lesions meeting the selection criteria of radiofrequency studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this