Abstract
This study assessed whether the inclusion of two rotavirus (RV) vaccines in the Dutch national immunization programme is cost-effective. Costs and outcomes in unvaccinated and vaccinated populations are compared for a time period of 20 years. In the baseline, assuming competitive market forces in relation to vaccine costs, Rotarix is more cost-effective than RotaTeq, resulting in a cost-utility ratio (CUR) of euro 53,000 per DALY (third payer perspective) and euro 49,000 per DALY (societal perspective), but both considered as being not cost-effective. Vaccine-related costs, annual epidemic-size, and indirect protection are the major factors that determine cost-effectiveness of RV vaccination.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2624-2635 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Vaccine |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 14 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is it cost-effective to introduce rotavirus vaccination in the Dutch national immunization program?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver