TY - JOUR
T1 - Is it cost-effective to introduce rotavirus vaccination in the Dutch national immunization program?
AU - Mangen, M.J.J.
AU - van Duynhoven, Y.T.
AU - Vennema, H.
AU - van Pelt, W.
AU - Havelaar, A.H.
AU - de Melker, H.E.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - This study assessed whether the inclusion of two rotavirus (RV) vaccines in the Dutch national immunization programme is cost-effective. Costs and outcomes in unvaccinated and vaccinated populations are compared for a time period of 20 years. In the baseline, assuming competitive market forces in relation to vaccine costs, Rotarix is more cost-effective than RotaTeq, resulting in a cost-utility ratio (CUR) of euro 53,000 per DALY (third payer perspective) and euro 49,000 per DALY (societal perspective), but both considered as being not cost-effective. Vaccine-related costs, annual epidemic-size, and indirect protection are the major factors that determine cost-effectiveness of RV vaccination.
AB - This study assessed whether the inclusion of two rotavirus (RV) vaccines in the Dutch national immunization programme is cost-effective. Costs and outcomes in unvaccinated and vaccinated populations are compared for a time period of 20 years. In the baseline, assuming competitive market forces in relation to vaccine costs, Rotarix is more cost-effective than RotaTeq, resulting in a cost-utility ratio (CUR) of euro 53,000 per DALY (third payer perspective) and euro 49,000 per DALY (societal perspective), but both considered as being not cost-effective. Vaccine-related costs, annual epidemic-size, and indirect protection are the major factors that determine cost-effectiveness of RV vaccination.
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.014
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 20109593
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 28
SP - 2624
EP - 2635
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
IS - 14
ER -