Introducing maternal morbidity audit in the Netherlands

J. Van Dillen*, J. A.J.M. Mesman, J. J. Zwart, K. W.M. Bloemenkamp, J. Van Roosmalen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To describe the panel audit process and to identify substandard care in selected women from a nationwide prospective cohort study into severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) in the Netherlands. Design Prospective audit of selected women with SAMM. Setting Eight audit meetings held throughout the Netherlands. Population All pregnant women in the Netherlands. Methods Before each meeting, SAMM details of selected women were sent to all panel members for individual assessment by completing an audit form. During a subsequent plenary meeting, findings were discussed and substandard care factors as judged by the majority of assessors were scored. Main outcome measures Incidence of substandard care and recommendations for improving the quality of care. Results Substandard care was identified in 53 of 67 women (79%). Specific recommendations were formulated concerning the procedure of audit and concerning local as well as national management guidelines. Conclusion Our findings reflect SAMM in the Netherlands and substandard care is present in four out of five women. Ongoing audit of women with SAMM is promoted both at local and national level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)416-421
Number of pages6
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume117
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2010

Keywords

  • Audit
  • Severe acute maternal morbidity
  • Substandard care
  • The Netherlands

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Introducing maternal morbidity audit in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this