Intravesical Instillation of Chemotherapy Before Radical Surgery for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The REBACARE Trial

Thomas van Doeveren, Sebastiaan Remmers, Egbert R Boevé, Erik B Cornel, Antoine G van der Heijden, Kees Hendricksen, Evelyne C C Cauberg, Rens Jacobs, Bin K Kroon, Annemarie M Leliveld, Richard P Meijer, Harm van Melick, Bob Merks, Jorg R Oddens, Benjamin Pradere, Luc A J Roelofs, Diederik M Somford, Peter de Vries, Bart Wijsman, Willemijn A K M WindtMarit Yska, Peter J Zwaan, Katja K H Aben, Pim J van Leeuwen, Joost L Boormans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and objective: Intravesical instillation of chemotherapy (IIC) after radical surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) reduces the risk of intravesical recurrence (IVR). However, compliance is low because of possible extravesical leakage after bladder cuff excision. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative IIC in reducing the risk of IVR. Methods: In this prospective, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 clinical trial, 190 chemonaïve patients with primary UTUC without prior or concurrent bladder cancer received a single intravesical instillation of mitomycin C for 1–2 hr within 3 h before surgery. The primary endpoint was the 2-yr histologically confirmed IVR rate, with a target reduction of >40% (from 33.2% according to literature data to <20%). A historical cohort of 247 patients with UTUC who did not receive perioperative IIC served as the reference. Secondary endpoints included compliance, toxicity, and IVR-free survival, which was analyzed via multivariable Cox regression and stratified by previous diagnostic ureteroscopy (d-URS). Key findings and limitations: The 2-yr IVR rate was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18–31%) on intention-to-treat analysis and 23% (95% CI 13–32%) on per-protocol analysis. Multivariable analysis revealed that d-URS was associated with higher IVR risk. In the REBACARE cohort, patients without d-URS had threefold lower IVR risk (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.12–0.87) in comparison to the reference cohort. Compliance with preoperative instillation was 96% and no grade >2 toxicity occurred. Conclusions and clinical implications: Preoperative IIC with mitomycin C was feasible and well tolerated and significantly reduced IVR risk for patients without d-URS. These findings suggest that preoperative IIC is a viable strategy for this subset of UTUC patients and that d-URS should be performed judiciously.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)444-452
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume87
Issue number4
Early online date21 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Keywords

  • Diagnostic ureteroscopy
  • Intravesical instillation
  • Intravesical recurrence
  • Phase 2 trial
  • Treatment
  • Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intravesical Instillation of Chemotherapy Before Radical Surgery for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The REBACARE Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this