TY - JOUR
T1 - Interprofessional shared decision-making in the ICU
T2 - A systematic review and recommendations from an expert panel
AU - Michalsen, Andrej
AU - Long, Ann C.
AU - DeKeyser Ganz, Freda
AU - White, Douglas B.
AU - Jensen, Hanne I.
AU - Metaxa, Victoria
AU - Hartog, Christiane S.
AU - Latour, Jos M.
AU - Truog, Robert D.
AU - Kesecioglu, Jozef
AU - Mahn, Anna R.
AU - Curtis, J. Randall
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. DeKeyser Ganz’s institution received funding from the Israel Institute of Health Policy Research, and she received funding from the Israel Higher Education Commission. Dr. Metaxa received funding from European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Dr. Truog received funding from Covance (Data Safety Monitoring Committee) and Sanofi (Data Safety Monitoring Copyright © 2019 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - Objectives: There is growing recognition that high-quality care for patients and families in the ICU requires exemplary interprofessional collaboration and communication. One important aspect is how the ICU team makes complex decisions. However, no recommendations have been published on interprofessional shared decision- making. The aim of this project is to use systematic review and normative analysis by experts to examine existing evidence regarding interprofessional shared decision-making, describe its principles and provide ICU clinicians with recommendations regarding its implementation. Data Sources: We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane databases and used normative analyses to formulate recommendations regarding interprofessional shared decision- making. Study Selection: Three authors screened titles and abstracts in duplicate. Data Synthesis: Four papers assessing the effect of interprofessional shared decision-making on quality of care were identified, suggesting that interprofessional shared decision-making is associated with improved processes and outcomes. Five recommendations, largely based on expert opinion, were developed: 1) interprofessional shared decision-making is a collaborative process among clinicians that allows for shared decisions regarding important treatment questions; 2) clinicians should consider engaging in interprofessional shared decision-making to promote the most appropriate and balanced decisions; 3) clinicians and hospitals should implement strategies to foster an ICU climate oriented toward interprofessional shared decision-making; 4) clinicians implementing interprofessional shared decision-making should consider incorporating a structured approach; and 5) further studies are needed to evaluate and improve the quality of interprofessional shared decision-making in ICUs. Conclusions: Clinicians should consider an interprofessional shared decision-making model that allows for the exchange of information, deliberation, and joint attainment of important treatment decisions.
AB - Objectives: There is growing recognition that high-quality care for patients and families in the ICU requires exemplary interprofessional collaboration and communication. One important aspect is how the ICU team makes complex decisions. However, no recommendations have been published on interprofessional shared decision- making. The aim of this project is to use systematic review and normative analysis by experts to examine existing evidence regarding interprofessional shared decision-making, describe its principles and provide ICU clinicians with recommendations regarding its implementation. Data Sources: We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane databases and used normative analyses to formulate recommendations regarding interprofessional shared decision- making. Study Selection: Three authors screened titles and abstracts in duplicate. Data Synthesis: Four papers assessing the effect of interprofessional shared decision-making on quality of care were identified, suggesting that interprofessional shared decision-making is associated with improved processes and outcomes. Five recommendations, largely based on expert opinion, were developed: 1) interprofessional shared decision-making is a collaborative process among clinicians that allows for shared decisions regarding important treatment questions; 2) clinicians should consider engaging in interprofessional shared decision-making to promote the most appropriate and balanced decisions; 3) clinicians and hospitals should implement strategies to foster an ICU climate oriented toward interprofessional shared decision-making; 4) clinicians implementing interprofessional shared decision-making should consider incorporating a structured approach; and 5) further studies are needed to evaluate and improve the quality of interprofessional shared decision-making in ICUs. Conclusions: Clinicians should consider an interprofessional shared decision-making model that allows for the exchange of information, deliberation, and joint attainment of important treatment decisions.
KW - Intensive care unit team
KW - Intensive care units
KW - Interprofessional collaboration
KW - Interprofessional communication
KW - Interprofessional decision-making
KW - Shared decision-making
KW - Humans
KW - Cooperative Behavior
KW - Interprofessional Relations
KW - Patient Care Team/organization & administration
KW - Group Processes
KW - Clinical Decision-Making/methods
KW - Intensive Care Units/organization & administration
KW - Communication
KW - interprofessional communication
KW - interprofessional decision-making
KW - intensive care unit team
KW - intensive care units
KW - interprofessional collaboration
KW - shared decision-making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071350502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003870
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003870
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31169620
AN - SCOPUS:85071350502
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 47
SP - 1258
EP - 1266
JO - Critical care medicine
JF - Critical care medicine
IS - 9
ER -