TY - JOUR
T1 - Interpretability of coronary CT angiography performed with a novel whole-heart coverage high-definition CT scanner in 300 consecutive patients with coronary artery bypass grafts
AU - Mushtaq, Saima
AU - Conte, Edoardo
AU - Pontone, Gianluca
AU - Pompilio, Giulio
AU - Guglielmo, Marco
AU - Annoni, Andrea
AU - Baggiano, Andrea
AU - Formenti, Alberto
AU - Mancini, Maria Elisabetta
AU - Muscogiuri, Giuseppe
AU - Nicoli, Flavia
AU - Giannitto, Caterina
AU - Magatelli, Marco
AU - Tanzilli, Alessandra
AU - Consiglio, Elisa
AU - Fiorentini, Cesare
AU - Bartorelli, Antonio L.
AU - Pirillo, Silvana P.
AU - Pepi, Mauro
AU - Andreini, Daniele
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Aims: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is an accurate non-invasive tool for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). However, inability to sustain a long breath-hold, high heart rate (HR) and atrial fibrillation may affect image quality. Moreover, radiation exposure is still a matter of some concern. A scanner combining 0.23-mm spatial resolution, new iterative reconstruction and fast gantry rotation time has been recently introduced in the clinical field. The aims of our study were to evaluate interpretability, radiation exposure and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA performed with the latest generation of cardiac-CT scanners compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the assessment of bypass grafts, and non-grafted and post-anastomotic native coronary arteries. Methods and results: We prospectively enrolled 300 patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA with a 16-cm z-axis coverage, 256-detector rows, and 0.28-sec gantry rotation time scanner. Coronary artery and graft interpretability, image quality and effective dose (ED) were assessed in all patients and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated in a subgroup of 100 patients who underwent ICA. Mean HR during the scan was 69.6 ± 10.8. Sinus rhythm was present in 118 patients with HR < 75 bpm and in 112 patients with HR ≥ 75 bpm, while 70 patients had atrial fibrillation. CABG interpretability was 100%. Compared to ICA, CCTA was able to correctly detecting occlusions or significant stenoses of all CABG segments. Overall interpretability of native coronary segments was 95.6%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of coronary arteries were 98.3%, 97.4%, 93.1%, 99.3% and 96.5%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy in a patient based analysis was 95.2%. Mean ED was 3.14 ± 1.7 mSv. Conclusions: The novel whole-heart coverage CT scanner allows to evaluating CABG and native coronary arteries with excellent interpretability and low radiation exposure even in the presence of unfavorable heart rhythm.
AB - Aims: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is an accurate non-invasive tool for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). However, inability to sustain a long breath-hold, high heart rate (HR) and atrial fibrillation may affect image quality. Moreover, radiation exposure is still a matter of some concern. A scanner combining 0.23-mm spatial resolution, new iterative reconstruction and fast gantry rotation time has been recently introduced in the clinical field. The aims of our study were to evaluate interpretability, radiation exposure and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA performed with the latest generation of cardiac-CT scanners compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the assessment of bypass grafts, and non-grafted and post-anastomotic native coronary arteries. Methods and results: We prospectively enrolled 300 patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA with a 16-cm z-axis coverage, 256-detector rows, and 0.28-sec gantry rotation time scanner. Coronary artery and graft interpretability, image quality and effective dose (ED) were assessed in all patients and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated in a subgroup of 100 patients who underwent ICA. Mean HR during the scan was 69.6 ± 10.8. Sinus rhythm was present in 118 patients with HR < 75 bpm and in 112 patients with HR ≥ 75 bpm, while 70 patients had atrial fibrillation. CABG interpretability was 100%. Compared to ICA, CCTA was able to correctly detecting occlusions or significant stenoses of all CABG segments. Overall interpretability of native coronary segments was 95.6%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of coronary arteries were 98.3%, 97.4%, 93.1%, 99.3% and 96.5%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy in a patient based analysis was 95.2%. Mean ED was 3.14 ± 1.7 mSv. Conclusions: The novel whole-heart coverage CT scanner allows to evaluating CABG and native coronary arteries with excellent interpretability and low radiation exposure even in the presence of unfavorable heart rhythm.
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - coronary artery bypass graft
KW - Coronary CT angiography
KW - high heart rate
KW - native coronary arteries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070201808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.08.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.08.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 31405817
AN - SCOPUS:85070201808
SN - 1934-5925
VL - 14
SP - 137
EP - 143
JO - Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
JF - Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
IS - 2
ER -