International Retrospective Comparison of Inpatient Rehabilitation for Patients With Spinal Cord Dysfunction: Differences According to Etiology

P.W. New, Ron Reeves, Einar Smith, I.E. Eriks-Hoogland, A. Gupta, G. Scivoletto, A. Townson, B. Maurizio, MWM Post

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives

To describe and compare epidemiologic characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with nontraumatic spinal cord dysfunction according to etiology.

Design

Retrospective, multicenter open-cohort case series.

Setting

Spinal rehabilitation units (SRUs) in 9 countries.

Participants

Patients (N=956; men, 60.8%; median age, 59.0y [interquartile range, 46–70.0y]; paraplegia, n=691 [72.3%]) with initial onset of spinal cord dysfunction consecutively admitted between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2010.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Etiology of spinal cord dysfunction, demographic characteristics, length of stay (LOS) in rehabilitation, pattern of spinal cord dysfunction onset, discharge destination, level of spinal cord damage, and the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade on admission and discharge.

Results

The most common etiologies were degenerative (30.8%), malignant tumors (16.2%), infections (12.8%), ischemia (10.9%), benign tumors (8.7%), other vascular (8.5%), and other conditions (12.1%). There were major differences in epidemiologic characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with different etiologies of spinal cord dysfunction. Paraplegia was more common in patients with a malignant tumor and vascular etiologies, while tetraplegia was more common in those with a degenerative etiology, a benign tumor, and infections. Patients with a malignant tumor tended to have the shortest LOS in the SRU, while those with a vascular etiology tended to have the longest. Except for patients with a malignant tumor, all patient groups had a significant change in their AIS grade between admission and discharge.

Conclusions

This international study of spinal cord dysfunction showed substantial variation between the different etiologies regarding demographic and clinical characteristics, including changes in AIS between admission and discharge.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-385
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume97
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Etiology
  • Outcome and process assessment (health care)
  • Rehabilitation
  • Spinal cord diseases
  • Spinal cord injuries

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Retrospective Comparison of Inpatient Rehabilitation for Patients With Spinal Cord Dysfunction: Differences According to Etiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this