Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International Evidence Based Reappraisal of Genes Associated with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Using the Clinical Genome Resource Framework

  • Cynthia A James
  • , Jan D H Jongbloed
  • , Ray E Hershberger
  • , Ana Morales
  • , Daniel P Judge
  • , Petros Syrris
  • , Kalliopi Pilichou
  • , Argelia Medeiros Domingo
  • , Brittney Murray
  • , Julia Cadrin-Tourigny
  • , Ronald Lekanne Deprez
  • , Rudy Celeghin
  • , Alexandros Protonotarios
  • , Babken Asatryan
  • , Emily Brown
  • , Elizabeth Jordan
  • , Jennifer McGlaughon
  • , Courtney Thaxton
  • , C Lisa Kurtz
  • , J Peter van Tintelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited disease characterized by ventricular arrhythmias and progressive ventricular dysfunction. Genetic testing is recommended, and a pathogenic variant in an ARVC-associated gene is a major criterion for diagnosis according to the 2010 Task Force Criteria. As incorrect attribution of a gene to ARVC can contribute to misdiagnosis, we assembled an international multidisciplinary ARVC Clinical Genome Resource Gene Curation Expert Panel to reappraise all reported ARVC genes. Methods: Following a comprehensive literature search, six 2-member teams conducted blinded independent curation of reported ARVC genes using the semiquantitative Clinical Genome Resource framework. Results: Of 26 reported ARVC genes, only 6 (PKP2, DSP, DSG2, DSC2, JUP, and TMEM43) had strong evidence and were classified as definitive for ARVC causation. There was moderate evidence for 2 genes, DES and PLN. The remaining 18 genes had limited or no evidence. RYR2 was refuted as an ARVC gene since clinical data and model systems exhibited a catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia phenotype. In ClinVar, only 5 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (1.1%) in limited evidence genes had been reported in ARVC cases in contrast to 450 desmosome gene variants (97.4%). Conclusions: Using the Clinical Genome Resource approach to gene-disease curation, only 8 genes (PKP2, DSP, DSG2, DSC2, JUP, TMEM43, PLN, and DES) had definitive or moderate evidence for ARVC, and these genes accounted for nearly all pathogenic/likely pathogenic ARVC variants in ClinVar. Therefore, only pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in these 8 genes should yield a major criterion for ARVC diagnosis. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified in other genes in a patient should prompt further phenotyping as variants in many of these genes are associated with other cardiovascular conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere003273
Pages (from-to)273-284
Number of pages12
JournalCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine
Volume14
Issue number3
Early online date8 Apr 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • desmosomes
  • diagnosis
  • genes
  • genetic testing
  • tachycardia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Evidence Based Reappraisal of Genes Associated with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Using the Clinical Genome Resource Framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this