TY - JOUR
T1 - International consensus on the management of metastatic gastric cancer
T2 - step by step in the foggy landscape: Bertinoro Workshop, November 2022
AU - Morgagni, Paolo
AU - Bencivenga, Maria
AU - Carneiro, Fatima
AU - Cascinu, Stefano
AU - Derks, Sarah
AU - Di Bartolomeo, Maria
AU - Donohoe, Claire
AU - Eveno, Clarisse
AU - Gisbertz, Suzanne
AU - Grimminger, Peter
AU - Gockel, Ines
AU - Grabsch, Heike
AU - Kassab, Paulo
AU - Langer, Rupert
AU - Lonardi, Sara
AU - Maltoni, Marco
AU - Markar, Sheraz
AU - Moehler, Markus
AU - Marrelli, Daniele
AU - Mazzei, Maria Antonietta
AU - Melisi, Davide
AU - Milandri, Carlo
AU - Moenig, Paul Stefan
AU - Mostert, Bianca
AU - Mura, Gianni
AU - Polkowski, Wojciech
AU - Reynolds, John
AU - Saragoni, Luca
AU - Van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
AU - Van Hillegersberg, Richard
AU - Vieth, Michael
AU - Verlato, Giuseppe
AU - Torroni, Lorena
AU - Wijnhoven, Bas
AU - Tiberio, Guido Alberto Massimo
AU - Yang, Han Kwang
AU - Roviello, Franco
AU - de Manzoni, Giovanni
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024. corrected publication 2024.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Background: Many gastric cancer patients in Western countries are diagnosed as metastatic with a median overall survival of less than twelve months using standard chemotherapy. Innovative treatments, like targeted therapy or immunotherapy, have recently proved to ameliorate prognosis, but a general agreement on managing oligometastatic disease has yet to be achieved. An international multi-disciplinary workshop was held in Bertinoro, Italy, in November 2022 to verify whether achieving a consensus on at least some topics was possible. Methods: A two-round Delphi process was carried out, where participants were asked to answer 32 multiple-choice questions about CT, laparoscopic staging and biomarkers, systemic treatment for different localization, role and indication of palliative care. Consensus was established with at least a 67% agreement. Results: The assembly agreed to define oligometastases as a “dynamic” disease which either regresses or remains stable in response to systemic treatment. In addition, the definition of oligometastases was restricted to the following sites: para-aortic nodal stations, liver, lung, and peritoneum, excluding bones. In detail, the following conditions should be considered as oligometastases: involvement of para-aortic stations, in particular 16a2 or 16b1; up to three technically resectable liver metastases; three unilateral or two bilateral lung metastases; peritoneal carcinomatosis with PCI ≤ 6. No consensus was achieved on how to classify positive cytology, which was considered as oligometastatic by 55% of participants only if converted to negative after chemotherapy. Conclusion: As assessed at the time of diagnosis, surgical treatment of oligometastases should aim at R0 curativity on the entire disease volume, including both the primary tumor and its metastases. Conversion surgery was defined as surgery on the residual volume of disease, which was initially not resectable for technical and/or oncological reasons but nevertheless responded to first-line treatment.
AB - Background: Many gastric cancer patients in Western countries are diagnosed as metastatic with a median overall survival of less than twelve months using standard chemotherapy. Innovative treatments, like targeted therapy or immunotherapy, have recently proved to ameliorate prognosis, but a general agreement on managing oligometastatic disease has yet to be achieved. An international multi-disciplinary workshop was held in Bertinoro, Italy, in November 2022 to verify whether achieving a consensus on at least some topics was possible. Methods: A two-round Delphi process was carried out, where participants were asked to answer 32 multiple-choice questions about CT, laparoscopic staging and biomarkers, systemic treatment for different localization, role and indication of palliative care. Consensus was established with at least a 67% agreement. Results: The assembly agreed to define oligometastases as a “dynamic” disease which either regresses or remains stable in response to systemic treatment. In addition, the definition of oligometastases was restricted to the following sites: para-aortic nodal stations, liver, lung, and peritoneum, excluding bones. In detail, the following conditions should be considered as oligometastases: involvement of para-aortic stations, in particular 16a2 or 16b1; up to three technically resectable liver metastases; three unilateral or two bilateral lung metastases; peritoneal carcinomatosis with PCI ≤ 6. No consensus was achieved on how to classify positive cytology, which was considered as oligometastatic by 55% of participants only if converted to negative after chemotherapy. Conclusion: As assessed at the time of diagnosis, surgical treatment of oligometastases should aim at R0 curativity on the entire disease volume, including both the primary tumor and its metastases. Conversion surgery was defined as surgery on the residual volume of disease, which was initially not resectable for technical and/or oncological reasons but nevertheless responded to first-line treatment.
KW - Consensus
KW - Multimodal treatment
KW - Oligometastatic gastric cancer
KW - Stage IV
KW - Staging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190671973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10120-024-01479-5
DO - 10.1007/s10120-024-01479-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 38634954
AN - SCOPUS:85190671973
SN - 1436-3291
VL - 27
SP - 649
EP - 671
JO - Gastric Cancer
JF - Gastric Cancer
IS - 4
ER -