Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Intermediate Dose Heparin Thromboprophylaxis among Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial

  • Charlotte A Bradbury*
  • , Bryan J McVerry
  • , Patrick R Lawler
  • , Derek C Angus
  • , Djillali Annane
  • , Yaseen M Arabi
  • , Diptesh Aryal
  • , Carly Au
  • , Abigail Beane
  • , Scott M Berry
  • , Lindsay R Berry
  • , Janis Best-Lane
  • , Shailesh Bihari
  • , Marc Bonten
  • , Frank Brunkhorst
  • , Aidan Burrell
  • , Meredith Buxton
  • , Marc Carrier
  • , Maurizio Cecconi
  • , Allen C Cheng
  • Matthew Cove, Lennie P G Derde, Michelle A Detry, Lise J Estcourt, Dean A Fergusson, Mark Fitzgerald, Rob A Fowler, Ewan C Goligher, Cameron Green, Rashan Haniffa, David A Harrison, Leanne M C Hays, Alisa M Higgins, Thomas Hills, Christopher M Horvat, David T Huang, Beverley J Hunt, Nao Ichihara, Devachandran Jayakumar, Stephanie Keattch, Anand Kumar, Michael A Laffan, Francois Lamontagne, Christine M Leeper, Roger J Lewis, Elizabeth Lorenzi, Sylvain A Lother, John C Marshall, Colin J McArthur, Roger E G Schutgens,
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background The optimal thromboprophylaxis among critically ill adults with COVID-19 is uncertain. Objectives To determine the effectiveness and safety of intermediate-dose heparin compared with standard low-dose thromboprophylaxis. Methods In an ongoing adaptive platform trial (randomized embedded multifactorial adaptive platform for community-acquired pneumonia), critically ill patients with COVID-19 were randomized to intermediate-dose heparin or standard low-dose thromboprophylaxis. Interventions were continued in hospital for up to 14 days. The primary endpoint was organ support-free days (OSFDs), an ordinal outcome combining in-hospital survival and the number of days free of intensive care unit-based respiratory or cardiovascular organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was an adjusted Bayesian hierarchical cumulative logistic model. An odds ratio (OR) > 1.0 represents an improved outcome with intermediate-dose heparin. Results Between April 27, 2021 and November 25, 2023, 1255 critically ill adults with COVID-19 were enrolled from 78 sites in 15 countries, of whom 1254 completed follow-up ( n = 572 intermediate-dose, n = 682 low-dose). Enrollment was terminated prior to reaching a prespecified statistical trigger due to declining case numbers and slow recruitment. Median age was 59 years, and 36.7% were female ( n = 461/1255). The probability that intermediate-dose heparin improved OSFDs was 73.5% (OR, 1.06; 95% credible interval, 0.87, 1.30), which did not meet the prespecified superiority threshold of 99%. Hospital survival was 77.1% (441/572) and 76.7% (523/682) in the intermediate- and low-dose heparin groups, respectively (median adjusted OR, 1.14; 95% credible interval, 0.86, 1.52). Major bleeding occurred in 10 of 572 (1.7%) and 14 of 682 (2.1%) patients receiving intermediate and standard low doses, respectively. Conclusion Intermediate-dose heparin did not improve OSFDs or survival compared with standard thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. ( ClinicalTrials.gov number: CT02735707).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2492-2505
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH
Volume24
Issue number7
Early online date25 Mar 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2026

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • anticoagulants
  • critical illness
  • heparin
  • pneumonia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intermediate Dose Heparin Thromboprophylaxis among Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this