TY - JOUR
T1 - Inter-observer agreement of MRI-based tumor delineation for preoperative radiotherapy boost in locally advanced rectal cancer
AU - Burbach, Johannes Peter Maarten
AU - Kleijnen, Jean Paul Johannes
AU - Reerink, Onne
AU - Seravalli, Enrica
AU - Philippens, Marielle E P
AU - Schakel, Tim
AU - van Asselen, B
AU - Raaymakers, Bas W.
AU - van Vulpen, Marco
AU - Intven, Martijn
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - Background While surgery remains the cornerstone of rectal cancer treatment, organ-preservation is upcoming. Therefore, neo-adjuvant treatment should be optimized. By escalating doses, response can be increased. To limit toxicity of boost, accurate gross tumor volume (GTV) definition is required. MRI, especially undeformed fast spin echo diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), looks promising for delineation. However, inconsistencies between observers should be quantified before clinical implementation. We aim to find which MRI sequence (T2w, DWI or combination) is optimal and clinically useful for GTV definition by evaluating inter-observer agreement. Methods Locally advanced rectal cancer patients (tumors 2). Three independent observers delineated T2w, DWI and combination (Combi) after training-set. Volumes, conformity index (CI), and maximum Hausdorff distance (HD) were calculated between any observer-pair per patient per modality. Results Twenty-four consecutive patients were included. One patient had cT2 (4.2%), 19 cT3 (79.1%) and 4 cT4 (16.7%), with 2 clinical node negative (8.3%), 4 cN1 (16.7%), and 18 cN2 (75.0%) on MRI. From 24 patients, 70 sequences were available (24x T2, 23x DWI, and 23x Combi). Between observers, no significant volume differences were observed per modality. T2 showed significantly largest volumes compared to DWI (mean difference 19.85 ml, SD 17.42, p <0.0001) and Combi (mean difference 7.16 ml, SD 11.58, p <0.0001). Mean CI was 0.70, 0.71 and 0.69 for T2, DWI and Combi respectively (p > 0.61). Average HD was largest on T2 (18.60 mm, max 31.40 mm, min 9.20 mm). Discussion Delineation on DWI resulted in delineation of the smallest volumes with similar consistency and mean distances, but with slightly lower Hausdorff distances compared to T2 and Combi. However, with lack of a gold standard it remains difficult to establish if delineations also represent true tumor. Study strengths were DWI adaptation to exclude geometrical distortions and training-set. DWI shows great potential for delineation purposes as long as sufficient experience exists and geometrical distortions are eliminated.
AB - Background While surgery remains the cornerstone of rectal cancer treatment, organ-preservation is upcoming. Therefore, neo-adjuvant treatment should be optimized. By escalating doses, response can be increased. To limit toxicity of boost, accurate gross tumor volume (GTV) definition is required. MRI, especially undeformed fast spin echo diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), looks promising for delineation. However, inconsistencies between observers should be quantified before clinical implementation. We aim to find which MRI sequence (T2w, DWI or combination) is optimal and clinically useful for GTV definition by evaluating inter-observer agreement. Methods Locally advanced rectal cancer patients (tumors 2). Three independent observers delineated T2w, DWI and combination (Combi) after training-set. Volumes, conformity index (CI), and maximum Hausdorff distance (HD) were calculated between any observer-pair per patient per modality. Results Twenty-four consecutive patients were included. One patient had cT2 (4.2%), 19 cT3 (79.1%) and 4 cT4 (16.7%), with 2 clinical node negative (8.3%), 4 cN1 (16.7%), and 18 cN2 (75.0%) on MRI. From 24 patients, 70 sequences were available (24x T2, 23x DWI, and 23x Combi). Between observers, no significant volume differences were observed per modality. T2 showed significantly largest volumes compared to DWI (mean difference 19.85 ml, SD 17.42, p <0.0001) and Combi (mean difference 7.16 ml, SD 11.58, p <0.0001). Mean CI was 0.70, 0.71 and 0.69 for T2, DWI and Combi respectively (p > 0.61). Average HD was largest on T2 (18.60 mm, max 31.40 mm, min 9.20 mm). Discussion Delineation on DWI resulted in delineation of the smallest volumes with similar consistency and mean distances, but with slightly lower Hausdorff distances compared to T2 and Combi. However, with lack of a gold standard it remains difficult to establish if delineations also represent true tumor. Study strengths were DWI adaptation to exclude geometrical distortions and training-set. DWI shows great potential for delineation purposes as long as sufficient experience exists and geometrical distortions are eliminated.
KW - Inter-observer agreement
KW - MRI
KW - Radiotherapy
KW - Rectal cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960219390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.10.030
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.10.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 26700601
AN - SCOPUS:84949844443
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 118
SP - 399
EP - 407
JO - Radiotherapy & Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy & Oncology
IS - 2
ER -