Intensive Imaging-based Follow-up of Surgically Treated Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma Does Not Improve Post-recurrence Survival: Results from a European Multicentre Database (RECUR)

Saeed Dabestani, Christian Beisland, Grant D Stewart, Karim Bensalah, Eirikur Gudmundsson, Thomas B Lam, William Gietzmann, Paimaun Zakikhani, Lorenzo Marconi, Sergio Fernandéz-Pello, Serenella Monagas, Samuel Paul Williams, Christian Torbrand, Thomas Powles, Erik Van Werkhoven, Richard Meijer, Alessandro Volpe, Michael Staehler, Börje Ljungberg, Axel Bex

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

After curative treatment for localised kidney cancer, a more intensive follow-up regimen than that recommended in the 2017 European Association of Urology guidelines did not improve overall survival among those experiencing recurrence, irrespective of the risk of recurrence. This suggests that an increase in follow-up imaging frequency is not cost-efficient. Prospective studies to identify more optimal follow-up strategies are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-264
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume75
Issue number2
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Keywords

  • Kidney cancer
  • Radical surgery
  • Follow-up
  • Imaging
  • Overall survival
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Ultrasonography/standards
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards
  • Europe
  • Humans
  • Nephrectomy/adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
  • Time Factors
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards
  • Databases, Factual

Cite this