Abstract
After curative treatment for localised kidney cancer, a more intensive follow-up regimen than that recommended in the 2017 European Association of Urology guidelines did not improve overall survival among those experiencing recurrence, irrespective of the risk of recurrence. This suggests that an increase in follow-up imaging frequency is not cost-efficient. Prospective studies to identify more optimal follow-up strategies are needed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 261-264 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | European Urology |
Volume | 75 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2019 |
Keywords
- Kidney cancer
- Radical surgery
- Follow-up
- Imaging
- Overall survival
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Ultrasonography/standards
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards
- Europe
- Humans
- Nephrectomy/adverse effects
- Treatment Outcome
- Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
- Time Factors
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards
- Databases, Factual