Integrated measure for training transfer in nursing practice: Development and validation study

Background: The persistent knowledge-practice gap in nursing, where competencies gained through continuing professional development fail to integrate into practice, remains a significant challenge. Effective transfer of acquired knowledge and skills to the workplace is essential for bridging this gap. However, there is a lack of comprehensive, validated instruments to assess factors influencing training transfer in nursing practice. Objective: This study aims to develop a questionnaire capable of assessing training transfer as an integrated construct, encompassing all factors influencing this process in nursing practice. Design: The study followed a developmental, iterative approach guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Setting(s): Eight tertiary teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants: Educational experts (n = 8) and nurses (n = 1588). Methods: The questionnaire development consisted of three phases: Phase 1) content development, in which instruments were identified based on a literature study and translation of included instruments into Dutch, Phase 2) pilot phase: content validation and usability testing using Delphi studies with experts and nurses, Phase 3) psychometric validation: construct validation using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, composite reliability and discriminant validity. The phases were completed from January 2023 till June 2024. Results: The literature review led to the inclusion of two key instruments: the Learning Transfer System Inventory (LTSI) and the Learning Climate Questionnaire (LCQ). Following item reduction based on Delphi rounds, nurses completed the adapted instruments. Psychometric validation demonstrated a good fit for these instruments in nursing practice. The adapted LTSI showed loadings ranging from 0.37 to 0.99, with a Normed Χ2 of 1.996, TLI of 0.908, CFI of 0.920, and RMSEA of 0.050 [CI = 0.047–0.054]. The adapted LCQ exhibited loadings from 0.64 to 0.94, with a Normed Χ2 of 3.385, TLI of 0.963, CFI of 0.974, and RMSEA of 0.069 [CI = 0.061–0.078]. The combined model demonstrated a Normed Χ2 of 2.014, TLI of 0.900, CFI of 0.907, and RMSEA of 0.051 [CI = 0.048–0.054]. Conclusions: The adapted LTSI and LCQ, both separately and combined, are reliable and valid instruments for use in the Dutch nursing hospital context. Together, they provide a comprehensive assessment of factors influencing training transfer. They can also be used independently to examine specific components such as trainers (LCQ), context (LTSI), personal aspects (LTSI), or training (LTSI/LCQ). Furthermore, these instruments can facilitate discussions between nurses, managers, and educational experts to address barriers to training transfer in nursing practice.