TY - JOUR
T1 - Innovative Tissue-Engineered Strategies for Osteochondral Defect Repair and Regeneration
T2 - Current Progress and Challenges
AU - Zhou, Liangbin
AU - Gjvm, Van Osch
AU - Malda, Jos
AU - Stoddart, Martin J.
AU - Lai, Yuxiao
AU - Richards, R. Geoff
AU - Ki-wai Ho, Kevin
AU - Qin, Ling
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the AO Foundation (AO‐OCD Consortium TA1711481: Osteochondral Bone Repair with Innovative Tissue‐Engineering and 3D Bioactive Composite Scaffolds) and in part by the Hong Kong RGC Theme‐based Research Scheme (T13‐402/17‐N) as well as the grant of “Shenzhen Double Chain Project for Innovation and Development Industry” supported by Bureau of Industry and Information Technology of Shenzhen (201908141541).
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the AO Foundation (AO-OCD Consortium TA1711481: Osteochondral Bone Repair with Innovative Tissue-Engineering and 3D Bioactive Composite Scaffolds) and in part by the Hong Kong RGC Theme-based Research Scheme (T13-402/17-N) as well as the grant of ?Shenzhen Double Chain Project for Innovation and Development Industry? supported by Bureau of Industry and Information Technology of Shenzhen (201908141541).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wiley-VCH GmbH
PY - 2020/12/2
Y1 - 2020/12/2
N2 - Clinical treatments for the repair of osteochondral defects (OCD) are merely palliative, not completely curative, and thus enormously unfulfilled challenges. With the in-depth studies of biology, medicine, materials, and engineering technology, the conception of OCD repair and regeneration should be renewed. During the past decades, many innovative tissue-engineered approaches for repairing and regenerating damaged osteochondral units have been widely explored. Various scaffold-free and scaffold-based strategies, such as monophasic, biphasic, and currently fabricated multiphasic and gradient architectures have been proposed and evaluated. Meanwhile, progenitor cells and tissue-specific cells have also been intensively investigated in vivo as well as ex vivo. Concerning bioactive factors and drugs, they have been combined with scaffolds and/or living cells, and even released in a spatiotemporally controlled manner. Although tremendous progress has been achieved, further research and development (R&D) is needed to convert preclinical outcomes into clinical applications. Here, the osteochondral unit structure, its defect classifications, and diagnosis are summarized. Commonly used clinical reparative techniques, tissue-engineered strategies, emerging 3D-bioprinting technologies, and the status of their clinical applications are discussed. Existing challenges to translation are also discussed and potential solutions for future R&D directions are proposed.
AB - Clinical treatments for the repair of osteochondral defects (OCD) are merely palliative, not completely curative, and thus enormously unfulfilled challenges. With the in-depth studies of biology, medicine, materials, and engineering technology, the conception of OCD repair and regeneration should be renewed. During the past decades, many innovative tissue-engineered approaches for repairing and regenerating damaged osteochondral units have been widely explored. Various scaffold-free and scaffold-based strategies, such as monophasic, biphasic, and currently fabricated multiphasic and gradient architectures have been proposed and evaluated. Meanwhile, progenitor cells and tissue-specific cells have also been intensively investigated in vivo as well as ex vivo. Concerning bioactive factors and drugs, they have been combined with scaffolds and/or living cells, and even released in a spatiotemporally controlled manner. Although tremendous progress has been achieved, further research and development (R&D) is needed to convert preclinical outcomes into clinical applications. Here, the osteochondral unit structure, its defect classifications, and diagnosis are summarized. Commonly used clinical reparative techniques, tissue-engineered strategies, emerging 3D-bioprinting technologies, and the status of their clinical applications are discussed. Existing challenges to translation are also discussed and potential solutions for future R&D directions are proposed.
KW - clinical applications
KW - osteochondral defect repair and regeneration
KW - scaffolds
KW - tissue-engineered strategies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093679690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/adhm.202001008
DO - 10.1002/adhm.202001008
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33103381
AN - SCOPUS:85093679690
SN - 2192-2640
VL - 9
JO - Advanced Healthcare Materials
JF - Advanced Healthcare Materials
IS - 23
M1 - 2001008
ER -