Individuals with abnormal phenotype and normal G-banding karyotype: Improvement and limitations in the diagnosis by the use of 24-colour FISH

  • Vladimir Bezrookove
  • , Kerstin Hansson
  • , Marja Van Der Burg
  • , Jasper J. Van Der Smagt
  • , Yvonne Hilhorst-Hofstee
  • , Joop Wiegant
  • , Geoff C. Beverstock
  • , Anton K. Raap
  • , Hans Tanke
  • , Martijn H. Breuning
  • , Carla Rosenberg*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The simultaneous identification, by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), of each chromosome in a distinct colour became feasible a few years ago. The key question in the application of this and many other developments in molecular cytogenetics to clinical situations is whether the results add significant further information that is relevant to the diagnosis. So far, limited data exist regarding how much improvement the technique brings to the diagnosis of phenotypically abnormal individuals in whom no abnormalities have been detected by conventional G-banding analysis. Because of the lack of a conclusive diagnosis, genetic counselling, estimation of recurrence risk and prenatal diagnosis of these individuals and their relatives is problematic. We report a study with 24-colour whole-chromosome painting of 10 familial and 11 isolated cases with abnormal phenotypes and normal G-banding karyotypes. Previously undetected unbalanced translocations were revealed in two cases. The value and current cost-effectiveness of multicolour FISH for cytogenetic diagnosis is discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)392-398
Number of pages7
JournalHuman Genetics
Volume106
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Individuals with abnormal phenotype and normal G-banding karyotype: Improvement and limitations in the diagnosis by the use of 24-colour FISH'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this