Indications for nonconventional ventilation modes

Casper Bollen*, Claude Danan, Xavier Durrmeyer, Kevin Dysart, Francesco Grasso, Brian P. Kavanagh, Martin Keszler, Peter C. Rimensberger, Thomas H. Shaffer, Marla R. Wolfs

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Critical care physicians facing patients that require invasive mechanical ventilation are confronted with the questions what type of ventilator and what ventilator strategy is most appropriate for this particular patient. Mechanical ventilation is initiated to bridge a gap to recovery or to supply chronic support. Failure of mechanical ventilation can arise through inability to deliver adequate gas exchange or through resulting complications, like pneumothorax. Although mechanical ventilation is meant to support respiratory function, mechanical ventilation can also result in pulmonary damage and contribute to increased risk of mortality. Therefore, the selection of the ventilator type and strategy should be guided by the capacity to achieve adequate gas exchange and, in the meanwhile, to prevent lung injury.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPediatric and Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation
Subtitle of host publicationFrom Basics to Clinical Practice
PublisherSpringer Berlin Heidelberg
Pages559-602
Number of pages44
ISBN (Electronic)9783642012198
ISBN (Print)9783642012181
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indications for nonconventional ventilation modes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this