TY - JOUR
T1 - Inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients
T2 - Prevalence, causes and interventions
AU - Vrijsen, B. E.L.
AU - Naaktgeboren, C. A.
AU - Vos, L. M.
AU - van Solinge, W. W.
AU - Kaasjager, H. A.H.
AU - ten Berg, M. J.
N1 - © 2020 The Authors.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Background: To reduce overutilization of laboratory testing many interventions have been tried, but selecting the most effective intervention for a given setting is challenging. To be sustainable, interventions need to align with healthcare providers' needs and daily practices. This study aimed to assess the extent of overutilization and the perspectives of healthcare providers, which may be used to guide the choice of intervention. Methods: The extent of inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients was evaluated using a database. Surveys and focus groups were used to investigate healthcare providers' perceptions on its causes and solutions. Results: On average, patients had 5.7 laboratory orders done during the first week of admission, whereas guidelines advise performing laboratory testing no more than twice per week. Repeat testing of normal test results occurred in up to 85% of patients. The frequency of laboratory testing was underestimated by survey responders, even though the majority of responders (78%) thought that laboratory tests are ordered too frequently. Residents were considered to be most responsible for laboratory test ordering. The primary causes of overutilization discussed were personal factors, such as a lack of awareness and knowledge, as well as feelings of insecurity. Regarding possible solutions, residents generally recommended educational interventions, whereas specialists tended to favour technical solutions such as lockouts. Conclusion: Inappropriate laboratory testing is common in internal medicine. The most important causes are a lack of awareness and knowledge, especially in residents. The intervention most favoured by residents is education, suggesting educational interventions may be most applicable.
AB - Background: To reduce overutilization of laboratory testing many interventions have been tried, but selecting the most effective intervention for a given setting is challenging. To be sustainable, interventions need to align with healthcare providers' needs and daily practices. This study aimed to assess the extent of overutilization and the perspectives of healthcare providers, which may be used to guide the choice of intervention. Methods: The extent of inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients was evaluated using a database. Surveys and focus groups were used to investigate healthcare providers' perceptions on its causes and solutions. Results: On average, patients had 5.7 laboratory orders done during the first week of admission, whereas guidelines advise performing laboratory testing no more than twice per week. Repeat testing of normal test results occurred in up to 85% of patients. The frequency of laboratory testing was underestimated by survey responders, even though the majority of responders (78%) thought that laboratory tests are ordered too frequently. Residents were considered to be most responsible for laboratory test ordering. The primary causes of overutilization discussed were personal factors, such as a lack of awareness and knowledge, as well as feelings of insecurity. Regarding possible solutions, residents generally recommended educational interventions, whereas specialists tended to favour technical solutions such as lockouts. Conclusion: Inappropriate laboratory testing is common in internal medicine. The most important causes are a lack of awareness and knowledge, especially in residents. The intervention most favoured by residents is education, suggesting educational interventions may be most applicable.
KW - Internal medicine
KW - Laboratory medicine
KW - Overtesting
KW - Overutilization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079246687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.02.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 32082564
AN - SCOPUS:85079246687
SN - 2049-0801
VL - 51
SP - 48
EP - 53
JO - Annals of Medicine and Surgery
JF - Annals of Medicine and Surgery
ER -