In vitro evaluation of spider silk meshes as a potential biomaterial for bladder reconstruction

Anne Steins, Pieter Dik, Wally H Müller, Stephin J Vervoort, Kerstin Reimers, Jörn W Kuhbier, Peter M Vogt, Aart A van Apeldoorn, Paul J Coffer, Koen Schepers*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Reconstruction of the bladder by means of both natural and synthetic materials remains a challenge due to severe adverse effects such as mechanical failure. Here we investigate the application of spider major ampullate gland-derived dragline silk from the Nephila edulis spider, a natural biomaterial with outstanding mechanical properties and a slow degradation rate, as a potential scaffold for bladder reconstruction by studying the cellular response of primary bladder cells to this biomaterial. We demonstrate that spider silk without any additional biological coating supports adhesion and growth of primary human urothelial cells (HUCs), which are multipotent bladder cells able to differentiate into the various epithelial layers of the bladder. HUCs cultured on spider silk did not show significant changes in the expression of various epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and fibrosis associated genes, and demonstrated only slight reduction in the expression of adhesion and cellular differentiation genes. Furthermore, flow cytometric analysis showed that most of the silk-exposed HUCs maintain an undifferentiated immunophenotype. These results demonstrate that spider silk from the Nephila edulis spider supports adhesion, survival and growth of HUCs without significantly altering their cellular properties making this type of material a suitable candidate for being tested in pre-clinical models for bladder reconstruction.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0145240
JournalPLoS ONE [E]
Volume10
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In vitro evaluation of spider silk meshes as a potential biomaterial for bladder reconstruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this