TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved sensitivity and precision in multicentre diffusion MRI network analysis using thresholding and harmonization
AU - de Brito Robalo, Bruno M
AU - de Luca, Alberto
AU - Chen, Christopher
AU - Dewenter, Anna
AU - Duering, Marco
AU - Hilal, Saima
AU - Koek, Huiberdina L
AU - Kopczak, Anna
AU - Lam, Bonnie Yin Ka
AU - Leemans, Alexander
AU - Mok, Vincent
AU - Onkenhout, Laurien P
AU - van den Brink, Hilde
AU - Biessels, Geert Jan
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by ZonMw, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (VICI grant 91816616 to G.J. Biessels). The research of A. Leemans is supported by VIDI Grant 639.072.411 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). Zoom@SVDs is part of the SVDs@target project. SVDs@target has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 666881. The CUHKRI is supported by General Research Fund (Grant No GRF CUHK 471911), the Lui CheWoo Institute of Innovative Medicine, and Therese Pei Fong Chow Research Centre for Prevention of Dementia (in memory of Donald H. K. Chow). Funding for the EDIS study was provided by the National Medical Research Council of Singapore.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/10/11
Y1 - 2022/10/11
N2 - PURPOSE: To investigate if network thresholding and raw data harmonization improve consistency of diffusion MRI (dMRI)-based brain networks while also increasing precision and sensitivity to detect disease effects in multicentre datasets.METHODS: Brain networks were reconstructed from dMRI of five samples with cerebral small vessel disease (SVD; 629 patients, 166 controls), as a clinically relevant exemplar condition for studies on network integrity. We evaluated consistency of network architecture in age-matched controls, by calculating cross-site differences in connection probability and fractional anisotropy (FA). Subsequently we evaluated precision and sensitivity to disease effects by identifying connections with low FA in sporadic SVD patients relative to controls, using more severely affected patients with a pure form of genetically defined SVD as reference.RESULTS: In controls, thresholding and harmonization improved consistency of network architecture, minimizing cross-site differences in connection probability and FA. In patients relative to controls, thresholding improved precision to detect disrupted connections by removing false positive connections (precision, before: 0.09-0.19; after: 0.38-0.70). Before harmonization, sensitivity was low within individual sites, with few connections surviving multiple testing correction (k = 0-25 connections). Harmonization and pooling improved sensitivity (k = 38), while also achieving higher precision when combined with thresholding (0.97).CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that network consistency, precision and sensitivity to detect disease effects in SVD are improved by thresholding and harmonization. We recommend introducing these techniques to leverage large existing multicentre datasets to better understand the impact of disease on brain networks.
AB - PURPOSE: To investigate if network thresholding and raw data harmonization improve consistency of diffusion MRI (dMRI)-based brain networks while also increasing precision and sensitivity to detect disease effects in multicentre datasets.METHODS: Brain networks were reconstructed from dMRI of five samples with cerebral small vessel disease (SVD; 629 patients, 166 controls), as a clinically relevant exemplar condition for studies on network integrity. We evaluated consistency of network architecture in age-matched controls, by calculating cross-site differences in connection probability and fractional anisotropy (FA). Subsequently we evaluated precision and sensitivity to disease effects by identifying connections with low FA in sporadic SVD patients relative to controls, using more severely affected patients with a pure form of genetically defined SVD as reference.RESULTS: In controls, thresholding and harmonization improved consistency of network architecture, minimizing cross-site differences in connection probability and FA. In patients relative to controls, thresholding improved precision to detect disrupted connections by removing false positive connections (precision, before: 0.09-0.19; after: 0.38-0.70). Before harmonization, sensitivity was low within individual sites, with few connections surviving multiple testing correction (k = 0-25 connections). Harmonization and pooling improved sensitivity (k = 38), while also achieving higher precision when combined with thresholding (0.97).CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that network consistency, precision and sensitivity to detect disease effects in SVD are improved by thresholding and harmonization. We recommend introducing these techniques to leverage large existing multicentre datasets to better understand the impact of disease on brain networks.
KW - Connectivity
KW - Diffusion MRI
KW - Harmonization: cerebral small vessel disease
KW - Thresholding
KW - White matter
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139983445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103217
DO - 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103217
M3 - Article
C2 - 36240537
SN - 2213-1582
VL - 36
JO - NeuroImage. Clinical
JF - NeuroImage. Clinical
M1 - 103217
ER -