Improved detection of colibactin-induced mutations by genotoxic E. coli in organoids and colorectal cancer

Axel Rosendahl Huber, Cayetano Pleguezuelos-Manzano, Jens Puschhof*, Joske Ubels, Charelle Boot, Aurelia Saftien, Mark Verheul, Laurianne T. Trabut, Niels Groenen, Markus van Roosmalen, Kyanna S. Ouyang, Henry Wood, Phil Quirke, Gerrit Meijer, Edwin Cuppen, Hans Clevers*, Ruben van Boxtel*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Co-culture of intestinal organoids with a colibactin-producing pks+ E. coli strain (EcC) revealed mutational signatures also found in colorectal cancer (CRC). E. coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) remains a commonly used probiotic, despite harboring the pks operon and inducing double strand DNA breaks. We determine the mutagenicity of EcN and three CRC-derived pks+ E. coli strains with an analytical framework based on sequence characteristic of colibactin-induced mutations. All strains, including EcN, display varying levels of mutagenic activity. Furthermore, a machine learning approach attributing individual mutations to colibactin reveals that patients with colibactin-induced mutations are diagnosed at a younger age and that colibactin can induce a specific APC mutation. These approaches allow the sensitive detection of colibactin-induced mutations in ∼12% of CRC genomes and even in whole exome sequencing data, representing a crucial step toward pinpointing the mutagenic activity of distinct pks+ E. coli strains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)487-496.e6
JournalCancer Cell
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • bacteria
  • cancer genomics
  • colibactin
  • colorectal cancer
  • genotoxins
  • machine learning
  • mutagenesis
  • mutational signatures
  • organoids
  • probiotics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improved detection of colibactin-induced mutations by genotoxic E. coli in organoids and colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this