TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementing HIV teams sustainably improves HIV indicator condition testing rates in hospitals in the Netherlands
T2 - the #aware.hiv clinical trial
AU - Jordans, Carlijn C E
AU - Vliegenthart-Jongbloed, Klaske
AU - Osbak, Kara K
AU - Hanssen, Jaap L J
AU - van Beek, Jan
AU - Vriesde, Marion
AU - van Holten, Natasja
AU - Dorama, Willemien
AU - van der Sluis, Dorien
AU - de Steenwinkel, Jurriaan
AU - van Kampen, Jeroen
AU - Verbon, Annelies
AU - Roukens, Anna H E
AU - Rokx, Casper
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - Objective: Develop and validate a strategy to improve HIV testing rates using HIV teams. Design: A prospective clinical trial was conducted from January 2020 to July 2023 in two Dutch university hospitals. Methods: The intervention involved implementing HIV teams to provide peer awareness, education, and feedback to physicians treating patients ≥18 years newly diagnosed with HIV indicator conditions. The primary outcome was the HIV testing rate. Secondary outcomes included testing rates by specialty, HIV prevalence, and reasons for withholding testing. Results: Of the 313,666 newly registered diagnoses, 2,395 involved indicator conditions. The overall HIV testing rate of newly diagnosed HIV indicator conditions increased from 50.1% (222/443) pre-implementation to 80.7% (1,575/1,952) post-implementation of HIV teams (p<0.001) with sustained improvement during the observation period (range 72.4-90.4%). The intervention was effective across physicians from all medical specialties. HIV prevalence among those tested was 0.6% (95%CI 0.3-1.1%). Peer feedback for 411 untested indicator conditions, resulted in 69 (16.3%) additional HIV tests. Failure to test frequently remained without reason (50.6%) or due to patient loss of follow-up (18.4%). Multivariate analysis indicated that women with indicator conditions were tested less often (aOR 0.59, 95%CI 0.45-0.79, p<0.01), and indicator conditions without HIV testing recommendations in national guidelines were also less likely to be tested for HIV (aOR 0.36, 95%CI 0.27-0.48, p<0.01). For external validation, we implemented this intervention in a second hospital, where it also significantly increased the testing rate post-implementation of HIV teams. Conclusion: Implementing HIV teams in hospitals is feasible, effective and leads to a sustained increase in HIV indicator condition-guided testing, supporting its broader adoption.
AB - Objective: Develop and validate a strategy to improve HIV testing rates using HIV teams. Design: A prospective clinical trial was conducted from January 2020 to July 2023 in two Dutch university hospitals. Methods: The intervention involved implementing HIV teams to provide peer awareness, education, and feedback to physicians treating patients ≥18 years newly diagnosed with HIV indicator conditions. The primary outcome was the HIV testing rate. Secondary outcomes included testing rates by specialty, HIV prevalence, and reasons for withholding testing. Results: Of the 313,666 newly registered diagnoses, 2,395 involved indicator conditions. The overall HIV testing rate of newly diagnosed HIV indicator conditions increased from 50.1% (222/443) pre-implementation to 80.7% (1,575/1,952) post-implementation of HIV teams (p<0.001) with sustained improvement during the observation period (range 72.4-90.4%). The intervention was effective across physicians from all medical specialties. HIV prevalence among those tested was 0.6% (95%CI 0.3-1.1%). Peer feedback for 411 untested indicator conditions, resulted in 69 (16.3%) additional HIV tests. Failure to test frequently remained without reason (50.6%) or due to patient loss of follow-up (18.4%). Multivariate analysis indicated that women with indicator conditions were tested less often (aOR 0.59, 95%CI 0.45-0.79, p<0.01), and indicator conditions without HIV testing recommendations in national guidelines were also less likely to be tested for HIV (aOR 0.36, 95%CI 0.27-0.48, p<0.01). For external validation, we implemented this intervention in a second hospital, where it also significantly increased the testing rate post-implementation of HIV teams. Conclusion: Implementing HIV teams in hospitals is feasible, effective and leads to a sustained increase in HIV indicator condition-guided testing, supporting its broader adoption.
KW - healthcare practitioner
KW - HIV
KW - HIV indicator condition
KW - HIV positivity rate
KW - HIV testing
KW - hospital
KW - sexually transmitted infections
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000098568
U2 - 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004167
DO - 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004167
M3 - Article
C2 - 40053486
SN - 0269-9370
VL - 39
SP - 995
EP - 1004
JO - AIDS (London, England)
JF - AIDS (London, England)
IS - 8
M1 - 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004167
ER -