Impact of surgical versus endoscopic management of complex nonmalignant polyps in a colorectal cancer screening program

Maaike Buskermolen, Steffie K Naber, Esther Toes-Zoutendijk, Miriam P van der Meulen, Wilhelmina M U van Grevenstein, Monique E van Leerdam, Manon C W Spaander, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When complex nonmalignant polyps are detected in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs, patients may be referred directly to surgery or may first undergo additional endoscopy for attempted endoscopic removal by an expert. We compared the impact of both strategies on screening effectiveness and costs.

METHODS: We used MISCAN-Colon to simulate the Dutch screening program, and projected CRC deaths prevented, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, and costs for two scenarios: 1) surgery for all complex nonmalignant polyps; 2) attempted removal by an expert endoscopist first. We made the following assumptions: 3.9 % of screen-detected large nonmalignant polyps were complex; associated surgery mortality was 0.7 %; the rate of successful removal by an expert was 87 %, with 0.11 % mortality.

RESULTS: The screening program was estimated to prevent 11.2 CRC cases (-16.7 %) and 10.1 CRC deaths (-27.1 %), resulting in 32.9 QALYs gained (+ 17.2 %) per 1000 simulated individuals over their lifetimes compared with no screening. The program would also result in 2.1 surgeries for complex nonmalignant polyps with 0.015 associated deaths per 1000 individuals. If, instead, these patients were referred to an expert endoscopist first, only 0.2 patients required surgery, reducing associated deaths by 0.013 at the expense of 0.003 extra colonoscopy deaths. Compared with direct referral to surgery, referral to an expert endoscopist gained 0.2 QALYs and saved €12 500 per 1000 individuals in the target population.

CONCLUSION: Referring patients with complex polyps to an expert endoscopist first reduced some surgery-related deaths while substantially improving cost-effectiveness of the screening program.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)871-880
Number of pages10
JournalEndoscopy
Volume54
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Keywords

  • Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging
  • Colonoscopy/methods
  • Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Early Detection of Cancer/methods
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of surgical versus endoscopic management of complex nonmalignant polyps in a colorectal cancer screening program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this