Impact of breast cancer history on decision-making for ovarian cancer risk-reducing surgery in the TUBA-WISP-II study

  • Tamar A Gootzen*
  • , Miranda P Steenbeek
  • , Marleen M H J van Gelder
  • , Majke H D van Bommel
  • , Anja J N H Timmer-Bonte
  • , C Marleen Kets
  • , Roni Nitecki-Wilke
  • , Elizabeth M Swisher
  • , Barbara M Norquist
  • , Karen H Lu
  • , Rosella P M G Hermens
  • , Joanne A de Hullu
  • ,
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Female BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers have an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. In the TUBA-WISP II study, women chose between standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy to prevent ovarian cancer. At inclusion, a substantial proportion of the enrolled women had a history of breast cancer, which could affect decision-making.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe decision-making regarding the type and timing of risk-reducing surgery between women with and without a history of breast cancer.

STUDY DESIGN: Premenopausal BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers completed Web-based questionnaires on their personal histories and preferred risk-reducing strategy. Differences in the type and timing of the first risk-reducing surgery between women with and without a history of breast cancer were assessed. A multivariate analysis was performed to examine personal, environmental, and breast cancer-related characteristics associated with the choice of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women with a history of breast cancer.

RESULTS: This study included 1676 women, among whom 222 (13.2%) had a history of breast cancer. Of note, 77.0% of women with a history of breast cancer chose risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy compared with 78.0% of women without a history of breast cancer (P=.73). Individuals with breast cancer before their BRCA1/2 diagnosis had their first surgery at a median of 2 years later than those who were diagnosed simultaneously or had their BRCA1/2 diagnosis first. Women diagnosed with breast cancer within the guideline age range for completing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (35-40 years for BRCA1 and 40-45 years for BRCA2) more often chose risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy than those before the guideline age range (odds ratio, 6.2 [95% confidence interval, 1.9-19.9]).

CONCLUSION: A history of breast cancer was not associated with a preference for a specific risk-reducing strategy. Women diagnosed with breast cancer within the guideline age range more often chose risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy than those diagnosed with breast cancer before the guideline age range.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)638.e1-638.e13
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume233
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Adult
  • BRCA1 Protein/genetics
  • BRCA2 Protein/genetics
  • Breast Neoplasms/genetics
  • Decision Making
  • Female
  • Genes, BRCA1
  • Genes, BRCA2
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control
  • Ovariectomy
  • Prophylactic Surgical Procedures
  • Risk Reduction Behavior
  • Salpingectomy
  • Salpingo-oophorectomy
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of breast cancer history on decision-making for ovarian cancer risk-reducing surgery in the TUBA-WISP-II study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this