TY - JOUR
T1 - Image quality and subject experience of quiet T1-weighted 7-T brain imaging using a silent gradient coil
AU - Jacobs, Sarah M.
AU - Versteeg, Edwin
AU - van der Kolk, Anja G.
AU - Visser, Leonie N.C.
AU - Oliveira, Ícaro A.F.
AU - van Maren, Emiel
AU - Klomp, Dennis W.J.
AU - Siero, Jeroen C.W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
PY - 2022/8/31
Y1 - 2022/8/31
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Acoustic noise in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) negatively impacts patients. We assessed a silent gradient coil switched at 20 kHz combined with a T
1-weighted magnetisation prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence at 7 T.
METHODS: Five healthy subjects (21-29 years; three females) without previous 7-T MRI experience underwent both a quiet MPRAGE (Q-MPRAGE) and conventional MPRAGE (C-MPRAGE) sequence twice. Image quality was assessed quantitatively, and qualitatively by two neuroradiologists. Sound level was measured objectively and rated subjectively on a 0 to 10 scale by all subjects immediately following each sequence and after the whole examination (delayed). All subjects also reported comfort level, overall experience and willingness to undergo the sequence again.RESULTS: Compared to C-MPRAGE, Q-MPRAGE showed higher signal-to-noise ratio (10%; p = 0.012) and lower contrast-to-noise ratio (20%; p < 0.001) as well as acceptable to good image quality. Q-MPRAGE produced 27 dB lower sound level (76 versus 103 dB). Subjects reported lower sound level for Q-MPRAGE both immediate (4.4 ± 1.4 versus 6.4 ± 1.3; p = 0.007) and delayed (4.6 ± 1.4 versus 6.3 ± 1.3; p = 0.005), while they rated comfort level (7.4 ± 1.0 versus 6.1 ± 1.7; p = 0.016) and overall experience (7.6 ± 1.0 versus 6.0 ± 0.9; p = 0.005) higher. Willingness to undergo the sequence again was also higher, however not significantly (8.1 ± 1.0 versus 7.2 ± 1.3; p = 0.066).CONCLUSION: Q-MPRAGE using a silent gradient coil reduced sound level by 27 dB compared to C-MPRAGE at 7 T while featuring acceptable-to-good image quality and a quieter and more pleasant subject experience.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Acoustic noise in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) negatively impacts patients. We assessed a silent gradient coil switched at 20 kHz combined with a T
1-weighted magnetisation prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence at 7 T.
METHODS: Five healthy subjects (21-29 years; three females) without previous 7-T MRI experience underwent both a quiet MPRAGE (Q-MPRAGE) and conventional MPRAGE (C-MPRAGE) sequence twice. Image quality was assessed quantitatively, and qualitatively by two neuroradiologists. Sound level was measured objectively and rated subjectively on a 0 to 10 scale by all subjects immediately following each sequence and after the whole examination (delayed). All subjects also reported comfort level, overall experience and willingness to undergo the sequence again.RESULTS: Compared to C-MPRAGE, Q-MPRAGE showed higher signal-to-noise ratio (10%; p = 0.012) and lower contrast-to-noise ratio (20%; p < 0.001) as well as acceptable to good image quality. Q-MPRAGE produced 27 dB lower sound level (76 versus 103 dB). Subjects reported lower sound level for Q-MPRAGE both immediate (4.4 ± 1.4 versus 6.4 ± 1.3; p = 0.007) and delayed (4.6 ± 1.4 versus 6.3 ± 1.3; p = 0.005), while they rated comfort level (7.4 ± 1.0 versus 6.1 ± 1.7; p = 0.016) and overall experience (7.6 ± 1.0 versus 6.0 ± 0.9; p = 0.005) higher. Willingness to undergo the sequence again was also higher, however not significantly (8.1 ± 1.0 versus 7.2 ± 1.3; p = 0.066).CONCLUSION: Q-MPRAGE using a silent gradient coil reduced sound level by 27 dB compared to C-MPRAGE at 7 T while featuring acceptable-to-good image quality and a quieter and more pleasant subject experience.
KW - Acoustics
KW - Healthy volunteers
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Neuroimaging
KW - Noise
KW - Brain/diagnostic imaging
KW - Humans
KW - Signal-To-Noise Ratio
KW - Female
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136969499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s41747-022-00293-x
DO - 10.1186/s41747-022-00293-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 36042139
AN - SCOPUS:85136969499
SN - 2509-9280
VL - 6
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - European radiology experimental
JF - European radiology experimental
IS - 1
M1 - 36
ER -