Identifying genetic differences between bipolar disorder and major depression through multiple genome-wide association analyses

Georgia Panagiotaropoulou, Kajsa-Lotta Georgii Hellberg, Jonathan R I Coleman, Darsol Seok, Janos Kalman, Philip B Mitchell, Peter R Schofield, Andreas J Forstner, Michael Bauer, Laura J Scott, Carlos N Pato, Michele T Pato, Qingqin S Li, George Kirov, Mikael Landén, Lina Jonsson, Bertram Müller-Myhsok, Jordan W Smoller, Elisabeth B Binder, Tanja M BrücklDarina Czamara, Sandra Van der Auwera, Hans J Grabe, Georg Homuth, Carsten O Schmidt, James B Potash, J Raymond DePaulo, Fernando S Goes, Dean F MacKinnon, Francis M Mondimore, Myrna M Weissman, Jianxin Shi, Mark A Frye, Joanna M Biernacka, Andreas Reif, Stephanie H Witt, René R Kahn, Marco M Boks, Michael J Owen, Katherine Gordon-Smith, Brittany L Mitchell, Nicholas G Martin, Sarah E Medland, Lisa Jones, James A Knowles, Douglas F Levinson, Michael C O'Donovan, Cathryn M Lewis, Gerome Breen, Roel A Ophoff,

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BPD) is difficult in clinical practice, with an average delay between symptom onset and diagnosis of about 7 years. A depressive episode often precedes the first manic episode, making it difficult to distinguish BPD from unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD).

AIMS: We use genome-wide association analyses (GWAS) to identify differential genetic factors and to develop predictors based on polygenic risk scores (PRS) that may aid early differential diagnosis.

METHOD: Based on individual genotypes from case-control cohorts of BPD and MDD shared through the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, we compile case-case-control cohorts, applying a careful quality control procedure. In a resulting cohort of 51 149 individuals (15 532 BPD patients, 12 920 MDD patients and 22 697 controls), we perform a variety of GWAS and PRS analyses.

RESULTS: Although our GWAS is not well powered to identify genome-wide significant loci, we find significant chip heritability and demonstrate the ability of the resulting PRS to distinguish BPD from MDD, including BPD cases with depressive onset (BPD-D). We replicate our PRS findings in an independent Danish cohort (iPSYCH 2015, N = 25 966). We observe strong genetic correlation between our case-case GWAS and that of case-control BPD.

CONCLUSIONS: We find that MDD and BPD, including BPD-D are genetically distinct. Our findings support that controls, MDD and BPD patients primarily lie on a continuum of genetic risk. Future studies with larger and richer samples will likely yield a better understanding of these findings and enable the development of better genetic predictors distinguishing BPD and, importantly, BPD-D from MDD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-90
Number of pages12
JournalThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science
Volume226
Issue number2
Early online date14 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Bipolar disorder
  • early differential diagnosis
  • genome-wide association analysis
  • major depressive disorder
  • polygenic risk scoring

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying genetic differences between bipolar disorder and major depression through multiple genome-wide association analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this