TY - JOUR
T1 - ICS educational module
T2 - The practice of uroflowmetry in adults
AU - Tarcan, Tufan
AU - Acar, Omer
AU - Agarwal, Mayank Mohan
AU - Rubilotta, Emanuele
AU - De Nunzio, Cosimo
AU - Rosier, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Aim: To present the body of evidence behind the International Continence Society (ICS) educational module on “Practice of uroflowmetry in adults” which consists of a PowerPoint® presentation. Methods: This evidence review has been prepared by a working group instituted by the ICS Urodynamics Committee. The method used included systematic literature review, consensus formation by the members of the Working Group, and review by members of the ICS Urodynamics Committee core panel. Results: A total of 104 articles were included in this systematic review. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Evidence analysis was conducted along the following themes: physiology of voiding, pathophysiology of lower urinary tract dysfunction, technique of uroflowmetry, quality check of the uroflowmetry test, interpretation and reporting of uroflowmetry findings. Conclusions: Uroflowmetry is the most commonly utilized diagnostic test in the evaluation of adults presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms. The practice of uroflowmetry exhibits variations which might lead to inconclusive or inaccurate assessments. The ICS educational module on the Practice of Uroflowmetry in Adults provides up-to-date and evidence-based guidance in an effort to establish standards in the technique, interpretation, and reporting of uroflowmetry.
AB - Aim: To present the body of evidence behind the International Continence Society (ICS) educational module on “Practice of uroflowmetry in adults” which consists of a PowerPoint® presentation. Methods: This evidence review has been prepared by a working group instituted by the ICS Urodynamics Committee. The method used included systematic literature review, consensus formation by the members of the Working Group, and review by members of the ICS Urodynamics Committee core panel. Results: A total of 104 articles were included in this systematic review. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Evidence analysis was conducted along the following themes: physiology of voiding, pathophysiology of lower urinary tract dysfunction, technique of uroflowmetry, quality check of the uroflowmetry test, interpretation and reporting of uroflowmetry findings. Conclusions: Uroflowmetry is the most commonly utilized diagnostic test in the evaluation of adults presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms. The practice of uroflowmetry exhibits variations which might lead to inconclusive or inaccurate assessments. The ICS educational module on the Practice of Uroflowmetry in Adults provides up-to-date and evidence-based guidance in an effort to establish standards in the technique, interpretation, and reporting of uroflowmetry.
KW - Adult
KW - Education
KW - Standardization
KW - Uroflowmetry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181098263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cont.2023.101065
DO - 10.1016/j.cont.2023.101065
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85181098263
VL - 9
JO - Continence
JF - Continence
M1 - 101065
ER -