Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Practice Variation Across 31 Centres From 20 European Countries. An AEPC Imaging Working Group Study

Massimiliano Cantinotti, Inga Voges, Giovanni di Salvo, Almudena Ortiz-Garrido, Tara Bharucha, Heynric Grotenhuis, Anna Sabate-Rotes, Anna Cavigelli, Arno Roest, Skaiste Sendzikaite, Oscar Nolan, Tristan Ramcharan, Karel Koubsky, Henrik Brun, Andreas C. Petropoulos, Hannah Bellsham-Revell, Anna Kaneva-Nencheva, Senka Mesihovic Dinarevic, Mohammad Ryan Abumehdi, Gylfi ÓskarssonPeter Olejnik, Gabriela Doros, Tiina Ojala, Thomas Salaets, Jan Sunnegård, Misha Bhat, Julie Wacker, Håkan Wåhlander, Inguna Lubaua, Ulrike Herberg, Owen Miller, Colin J. McMahon*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Despite significant advances in knowledge and the development of guidelines, the management of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) remains highly variable. A structured questionnaire was circulated across European Association of Paediatric & Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) affiliated centres. The aims were to evaluate standards in pre-operative assessment, types of surgery, follow-up and medical practices in children with HLHS. Thirty-one centres from 20 countries completed the survey. Delivery of babies with HLHS occurred in co-located maternity hospitals in 74% of centres; 29% were planned for spontaneous onset of labour, while 54% decided on a case-by-case basis. The preferred initial palliation was a right ventricle-pulmonary artery conduit in 55% of cases, modified Blalock-Thomas Taussig shunt (mBTTS) in 35%, and hybrid in 15% of cases. Timing for Glenn varied from 3 to 6 months of age and preoperative examination varied greatly: 65% performed cardiac catheterization and only 19% performed cardiac magnetic resonance. Stage III palliation was performed at a highly variable interval (2—6 years of age), nearly always employing an extracardiac conduit. Fenestration was routinely performed in 61% and reserved for borderline cases in 39%. All the centers adopted warfarin for the first 3–12 months after Fontan completion, and continued if a fenestration was present, while in non-fenestrated aspirin was left by most centers (e.g. 68%). However, there was a high disparity in the use of heart failure medications (e.g. in interstage I-II 35% use ACE-inhibitors, and only 26% digoxin). Follow-up practice also varied widely with only 60% employing specific protocols. Conclusion: This first multi-centre European survey from 31 centres from 20 different European countries highlighted a high practice variation in HLHS management across all the stages of Single Ventricle (Fontan) palliation. Major variations pertained to pre- and post-surgical investigations, surgical strategy for stage I and III, medical treatment regimens, and follow-up programs. (Table presented.)

Original languageEnglish
Article number379
JournalEuropean Journal of Pediatrics
Volume184
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • Congenital heart disease
  • Hypoplastic left heart syndrome
  • Imaging
  • Management
  • Practice
  • Variation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Practice Variation Across 31 Centres From 20 European Countries. An AEPC Imaging Working Group Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this