TY - JOUR
T1 - Hypertension after renal transplantation calcium channel or converting enzyme blockade?
AU - Van Der Schaaf, Margriet R.
AU - Hené, Ronald J.
AU - Floor, Marianne
AU - Blankestijn, Peter J.
AU - Koomans, Hein A.
PY - 1995/1/1
Y1 - 1995/1/1
N2 - We compared the effects of 4 weeks of calcium channel blockade (amlodipine) or converting enzyme inhibition (lisinopril) on blood pressure and renal hemodynamics in a double-blind crossover trial in a group of 20 hypertensive cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients. Amlodipine (10 mg) was more effective than the same dose of lisinopril in controlling hypertension (mean 24-hour arterial pressure, 111±9 and 115±9 mm Hg, respectively; P<.05). Blood pressure during both treatments was lower than during placebo (124±12 mm Hg, P<.05). Compared with placebo, amlodipine treatment was associated with a significant increase in glomerular filtration rate (10±20%, P<.05) and effective renal plasma flow (27±20%, P<.01) and a decrease in renal vascular resistance (23±18%, P<.01). Renal hemodynamics did not change during lisinopril. Neither drug had an effect on proteinuria. The data indicate that amlodipine is more effective than lisinopril in controlling hypertension in cyclosporine-treated patients and that treatment with amlodipine but not with lisinopril is accompanied by an increase in glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow and a decrease in renal vascular resistance. The data suggest that the renin-angiotensin system does not play a main role in determining cyclosporine-associated changes in renal hemodynamics and has a limited role in determining cyclosporine-associated hypertension.
AB - We compared the effects of 4 weeks of calcium channel blockade (amlodipine) or converting enzyme inhibition (lisinopril) on blood pressure and renal hemodynamics in a double-blind crossover trial in a group of 20 hypertensive cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients. Amlodipine (10 mg) was more effective than the same dose of lisinopril in controlling hypertension (mean 24-hour arterial pressure, 111±9 and 115±9 mm Hg, respectively; P<.05). Blood pressure during both treatments was lower than during placebo (124±12 mm Hg, P<.05). Compared with placebo, amlodipine treatment was associated with a significant increase in glomerular filtration rate (10±20%, P<.05) and effective renal plasma flow (27±20%, P<.01) and a decrease in renal vascular resistance (23±18%, P<.01). Renal hemodynamics did not change during lisinopril. Neither drug had an effect on proteinuria. The data indicate that amlodipine is more effective than lisinopril in controlling hypertension in cyclosporine-treated patients and that treatment with amlodipine but not with lisinopril is accompanied by an increase in glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow and a decrease in renal vascular resistance. The data suggest that the renin-angiotensin system does not play a main role in determining cyclosporine-associated changes in renal hemodynamics and has a limited role in determining cyclosporine-associated hypertension.
KW - Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
KW - Antihypertensive therapy
KW - Calcium channel blockers
KW - Kidney transplantation
KW - Vascular resistance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028936410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/01.HYP.25.1.77
DO - 10.1161/01.HYP.25.1.77
M3 - Article
C2 - 7843758
AN - SCOPUS:0028936410
SN - 0194-911X
VL - 25
SP - 77
EP - 81
JO - Hypertension
JF - Hypertension
IS - 1
ER -