How unexpected are unexpected findings in prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis? A literature review

Myra C.B. Van Zwieten*, Dick L. Willems, Liesbeth L. Litjens, Heleen G. Schuring-Blom, Nico Leschot

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this review was to gain understanding about unexpected findings in prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis. This category of results might be excluded from prenatal testing when new molecular tests such as I-FISH and QF-PCR will be applied in a future scenario of targeted testing. The literature was systematically searched for publications wherein the term unexpected or a synonym refers to testing results with specific problems. On the selected articles a qualitative analysis was performed, using the methods of cross-case analysis and within-case analysis. Sixteen articles published between 1979 and 2003 were selected. Analysis led to the classification of four problems of unexpected findings: I. unexpected for professionals; II. unexpected for patients; III. uncertainty; IV. other difficult counselling issues. We conclude that currently the problems of unexpected findings relate only slightly to their unexpected character. Instead, the main problems of unexpected findings relate to uncertainty and other aspects which create difficult counselling issues. As such, unexpected findings can be distinguished only gradually from standard results. Before targeted testing can be applied it is necessary to establish exact criteria in order to discern unexpected findings from standard testing results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-21
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume120
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2005

Keywords

  • Chromosome aberrations
  • FISH
  • Molecular diagnostics
  • QF-PCR
  • Unexpected findings

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How unexpected are unexpected findings in prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis? A literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this