TY - JOUR
T1 - How much is too much? Threshold dose distributions for 5 food allergens
AU - Ballmer-Weber, Barbara K.
AU - Fernandez-Rivas, Montserrat
AU - Beyer, Kirsten
AU - Defernez, Marianne
AU - Sperrin, Matthew
AU - Mackie, Alan R.
AU - Salt, Louise J.
AU - Hourihane, Jonathan O B
AU - Asero, Riccardo
AU - Belohlavkova, Simona
AU - Kowalski, Marek
AU - De Blay, Frédéric
AU - Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G.
AU - Clausen, Michael
AU - Knulst, André C.
AU - Roberts, Graham
AU - Popov, Ted
AU - Sprikkelman, Aline B.
AU - Dubakiene, Ruta
AU - Vieths, Stefan
AU - Van Ree, Ronald
AU - Crevel, René
AU - Mills, E. N Clare
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Background Precautionary labeling is used to warn consumers of the presence of unintended allergens, but the lack of agreed allergen thresholds can result in confusion and risk taking by patients with food allergy. The lack of data on threshold doses below which subjects are unlikely to react is preventing the development of evidence-based allergen management strategies that are understood by clinician and patient alike. Objective We sought to define threshold dose distributions for 5 major allergenic foods in the European population. Methods Patients with food allergy were drawn from the EuroPrevall birth cohort, community surveys, and outpatient clinic studies and invited to undergo a food challenge. Low-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges were undertaken with commercially available food ingredients (peanut, hazelnut, celery, fish, and shrimp) blinded into common matrices. Dose distributions were modeled by using interval-censoring survival analysis with 3 parametric approaches. Results Of the 5 foods used for challenge, 4 produced similar dose distributions, with estimated doses eliciting reactions in 10% of the allergic population (ED10), ranging from 1.6 to 10.1 mg of protein for hazelnut, peanut, and celery with overlapping 95% CIs. ED10 values for fish were somewhat higher (27.3 mg of protein), although the CIs were wide and overlapping between fish and plant foods. Shrimp provided radically different dose distributions, with an ED10 value of 2.5 g of protein. Conclusion This evidence base will contribute to the development of reference doses and action levels for allergens in foods below which only the most sensitive subjects might react.
AB - Background Precautionary labeling is used to warn consumers of the presence of unintended allergens, but the lack of agreed allergen thresholds can result in confusion and risk taking by patients with food allergy. The lack of data on threshold doses below which subjects are unlikely to react is preventing the development of evidence-based allergen management strategies that are understood by clinician and patient alike. Objective We sought to define threshold dose distributions for 5 major allergenic foods in the European population. Methods Patients with food allergy were drawn from the EuroPrevall birth cohort, community surveys, and outpatient clinic studies and invited to undergo a food challenge. Low-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges were undertaken with commercially available food ingredients (peanut, hazelnut, celery, fish, and shrimp) blinded into common matrices. Dose distributions were modeled by using interval-censoring survival analysis with 3 parametric approaches. Results Of the 5 foods used for challenge, 4 produced similar dose distributions, with estimated doses eliciting reactions in 10% of the allergic population (ED10), ranging from 1.6 to 10.1 mg of protein for hazelnut, peanut, and celery with overlapping 95% CIs. ED10 values for fish were somewhat higher (27.3 mg of protein), although the CIs were wide and overlapping between fish and plant foods. Shrimp provided radically different dose distributions, with an ED10 value of 2.5 g of protein. Conclusion This evidence base will contribute to the development of reference doses and action levels for allergens in foods below which only the most sensitive subjects might react.
KW - allergy
KW - celeriac
KW - EuroPrevall
KW - fish
KW - Food
KW - hazelnut
KW - peanut
KW - shrimp
KW - threshold
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926252392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.047
DO - 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.047
M3 - Article
C2 - 25589011
AN - SCOPUS:84926252392
SN - 0091-6749
VL - 135
SP - 964
EP - 971
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
IS - 4
ER -