HIV-1 pretreatment drug resistance negatively impacts outcomes of first-line antiretroviral treatment

Lucas E. Hermans, Laura M. Hofstra, Rob Schuurman, Rob Ter Heine, David M. Burger, Stijn A.J. Talboom, Dorien De Jong, Hugo A. Tempelman, Willem D.F. Venter, Monique Nijhuis, Annemarie M.J. Wensing*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction:Pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa is rising, but evidence of its impact on efavirenz (EFV)-based antiretroviral treatment (ART) is inconclusive. We determined the impact of PDR on outcomes of EFV-based ART in a subanalysis of a randomized clinical trial comparing different ART monitoring strategies implemented at a rural treatment facility in Limpopo, South Africa.Methods:Participants initiating EFV-based first-line ART (2015-2017) were enrolled and received 96 weeks follow-up. Resistance to nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-NRTI's (NNRTIs) was retrospectively assessed by population-based sequencing. Virological failure was defined as a viral load of at least 1000 copies/ml after at least 24 weeks of ART.Results:A total of 207 participants were included, 60.4% (125/207) of whom were female. Median age was 38.8 (interquartile range: 31.4-46.7) years. Median CD4+cell count was 191 (interquartile range: 70-355) cells/μl. PDR was detected in 12.9% (25/194) of participants with available sequencing results; 19 had NNRTI-resistance, and six had NRTI- and NNRTI-resistance. 26.0% of participants (40/154) with sequencing results and virological follow-up developed virological failure. PDR was independently associated with failure (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.7 [95% confidence interval: 1.68.5], P = 0.002). At failure, 87.5% (7/8) of participants with PDR harboured dual-class resistant virus, versus 16.7% (4/24) of participants without PDR (P = 0.0007). Virological resuppression after failure on first-line ART occurred in 57.7% (15/26) of participants without PDR versus 14.3% (1/7) of participants with PDR (P = 0.09).Conclusion:PDR was detected in 13% of study participants. PDR significantly increased the risk of virological failure of EFV-based ART. Accumulation of resistance at failure and inability to achieve virological resuppression illustrates the profound impact of PDR on treatment outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)923-931
Number of pages9
JournalAIDS
Volume36
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Antiretroviral treatment
  • HIV
  • pretreatment drug resistance
  • HIV Infections
  • Humans
  • Drug Resistance, Viral
  • Male
  • Anti-Retroviral Agents/pharmacology
  • Viral Load
  • HIV Seropositivity/drug therapy
  • HIV-1/genetics
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Drug Resistance
  • Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology
  • antiretroviral treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'HIV-1 pretreatment drug resistance negatively impacts outcomes of first-line antiretroviral treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this