Histopathologische gradering van het mammacarcinoom: GROTE VARIATIE MET GROTE GEVOLGEN?

Translated title of the contribution: Histopathologic grading of breast cancer: Large variation with major consequences?

C. van Dooijeweert, I. O. Baas, I. A.G. Deckers, E. van der Wall, P. J. van Diest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The pathologist's assessment of tumor tissue plays a critical role in therapeutic decision-making in early-stage invasive breast cancer. In daily practice, however, there appears to be considerable variation in grading between the different Dutch pathology laboratories and between individual pathologists within the same laboratory. This underlines the need to standardize grading by pathologists as much as possible in order to minimize the risk of a worse outcome for patients due to under-treatment and of unnecessary toxicity from over-treatment. Therefore, two initiatives were launched, i.e. laboratory-specific feedback reports and an e-learning module in which pathologists were trained in grading of invasive breast cancer. While these initiatives have yielded encouraging results, the overall variation in grading remains significant. Awareness of this variation, and of the inherent difficulties of subjective grading, among the various clinicians involved in breast cancer management, is therefore of utmost importance to improve clinical decision-making for patients.

Translated title of the contributionHistopathologic grading of breast cancer: Large variation with major consequences?
Original languageDutch
Article numberD5441
Number of pages4
JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
Volume164
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Early Detection of Cancer/methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Neoplasm Grading/methods
  • Pathologists/education
  • Pathology, Clinical/education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Histopathologic grading of breast cancer: Large variation with major consequences?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this