TY - JOUR
T1 - Higher off-target amplicon detection rate in MiSeq v3 compared to v2 reagent kits in the context of 16S-rRNA-sequencing
AU - Odendaal, Mari Lee
AU - Groot, James A.
AU - Hasrat, Raiza
AU - Chu, Mei Ling J.N.
AU - Franz, Eelco
AU - Bogaert, Debby
AU - Bosch, Thijs
AU - de Steenhuijsen Piters, Wouter A.A.
N1 - Funding Information:
PIENTER-3 was conducted by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), in close collaboration with the local Public Health Services (GGD) and Statistics Netherlands (CBS). We would like to thank our laboratory team Jolanda Kool, Sjoerd Kuiling and Elske M. van Logchem. In addition, we would like to thank all volunteers who participated in this study. This work (salaries R.H., W.A.A.d.S.P.) was also supported by The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific research (NWO-VIDI; Grant 91715359).
Funding Information:
PIENTER-3 was conducted by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), in close collaboration with the local Public Health Services (GGD) and Statistics Netherlands (CBS). We would like to thank our laboratory team Jolanda Kool, Sjoerd Kuiling and Elske M. van Logchem. In addition, we would like to thank all volunteers who participated in this study. This work (salaries R.H., W.A.A.d.S.P.) was also supported by The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific research (NWO-VIDI; Grant 91715359).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/10/1
Y1 - 2022/10/1
N2 - One of the most widely used techniques in microbiota research is 16S-rRNA-sequencing. Several laboratory processes have been shown to impact sequencing results, especially in low biomass samples. Low biomass samples are prone to off-target amplification, where instead of bacterial DNA, host DNA is erroneously amplified. Knowledge on the laboratory processes influencing off-target amplification and detection is however scarce. We here expand on previous findings by demonstrating that off-target amplification is not limited to invasive biopsy samples, but is also an issue in low bacterial biomass respiratory (mucosal) samples, especially when below 0.3 pg/μL. We show that off-target amplification can partly be mitigated by using gel-based library purification methods. Importantly, we report a higher off-target amplicon detection rate when using MiSeq reagent kit v3 compared to v2 (mean 13.3% vs 0.1% off-target reads/sample, respectively), possibly as a result of differences in reagents or sequencing recipes. However, since after bioinformatic removal of off-target reads, MiSeq reagent kit v3 still results in a twofold higher number of reads when compared to v2, v3 is still preferred over v2. Together, these results add to the growing knowledge base on off-target amplification and detection, allowing researchers to anticipate this problem in 16S-rRNA-based microbiome studies involving low biomass samples.
AB - One of the most widely used techniques in microbiota research is 16S-rRNA-sequencing. Several laboratory processes have been shown to impact sequencing results, especially in low biomass samples. Low biomass samples are prone to off-target amplification, where instead of bacterial DNA, host DNA is erroneously amplified. Knowledge on the laboratory processes influencing off-target amplification and detection is however scarce. We here expand on previous findings by demonstrating that off-target amplification is not limited to invasive biopsy samples, but is also an issue in low bacterial biomass respiratory (mucosal) samples, especially when below 0.3 pg/μL. We show that off-target amplification can partly be mitigated by using gel-based library purification methods. Importantly, we report a higher off-target amplicon detection rate when using MiSeq reagent kit v3 compared to v2 (mean 13.3% vs 0.1% off-target reads/sample, respectively), possibly as a result of differences in reagents or sequencing recipes. However, since after bioinformatic removal of off-target reads, MiSeq reagent kit v3 still results in a twofold higher number of reads when compared to v2, v3 is still preferred over v2. Together, these results add to the growing knowledge base on off-target amplification and detection, allowing researchers to anticipate this problem in 16S-rRNA-based microbiome studies involving low biomass samples.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139129658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-022-20573-1
DO - 10.1038/s41598-022-20573-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 36183009
AN - SCOPUS:85139129658
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 12
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 16489
ER -